There are only three ways to make an ape-man: 1) make an ape more human-like, 2) make a human more ape-like, or 3) fraudulently mix the two together. Homo naledi, a new fossil species discovered in a South African cave chamber, is another example of trying to make an ape more human-like.
Determining the genetic basis for differences between humans and chimps does not explain the origin of those differences. We share not a common ancestor but a common Designer.
Genetics has clearly established that Neanderthals and Denisovans were fully human. Any physical differences should be viewed as nothing more than variations that can occur within the human race descended from Adam and Eve.
Human fossils —and their stone tools—are strikingly similar everywhere they are found in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene layers. These people had large brow ridges, small chins, and receding foreheads.
Evolutionary anthropologists believe mental abilities had to evolve. Yet they note large gaps in this archaeological record across which it is difficult to discern whether mental evolution was gradual or punctuated by leaps and losses.
The discovery of an ancient man entombed in the Alps’ ice was one of the greatest finds of the last century.
Evolutionists advance a creative explanation for why humans developed complex technology later than when they say modern humans (and their brains) evolved.
Neanderthals apparently made string suggesting they were as smart as modern humans—something biblical creationists have been saying all along.
Evolutionists re-imagine the fossils Homo erectus, Paranthropus, and Australopithecus again as new research is compiled by CNN.com.
A ground stone tool allowed “paleolithic” humans to make flour. Such “early” human plant-eating is surprising to evolutionists, but aligns with biblical history.
New study suggest human fingers evolved from a 380-milllion year old fish. Secular researchers don’t disclose evolutionary assumptions or dating problems.
A new study confirms ancient Neanderthals collected seashells, created tools from them, and otherwise acted like humans – because they were.
Two chimps swaying and walking in synchronization is thought by these researchers to provide insight into the evolution of dance.
Our modern society believes we are just reaching the height of human intelligence. If we accept this evolutionary view, what do we do with the biblical account?
A recent study shows human saliva is different from that of chimpanzees, gorillas, and macaques—not surprising results from a biblical perspective.
Perhaps, in fact, it’s our discomfort with not knowing what to do with cavemen that makes us laugh. So just who were they?
A recent study trumpeted the discovery of a supposedly 11.6-million-year-old ape from what is now Germany. Did they find a missing link? Well, not so fast.
The website The Conversation hosted an article, in a series designed for children, to answer a reader-submitted question, “Are humans going to evolve again?”
Headlines trumpeted the news last week, “New species of early human found in the Philippines.” How should we as biblical creationists understand this find?
A new study proposes maybe it was a taste for fat that gave early humans bigger brains needed to evolve into modern humans—and that’s why we crave fat today.
It’s long been believed the great Inca civilization never left behind any written records. But what if that’s just because we couldn’t recognize their writing?
Neanderthals have long been considered our evolutionary cousins and are usually portrayed as brutish and uncivilized. But is this characterization true?
The scientific community is buzzing with the news that a bone fragment was recovered from a young girl whose parents belonged to Neanderthals and Denisovans.
The fossil record shows a great deal of diversity among post-Flood humans (scientists haven’t found any pre-Flood humans as of yet).
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.