Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
Triceratops skulls entombed in Montana’s Upper Cretaceous Hell Creek Formation tell a story, but not the tale of being trapped by the sands of time! The nature of the rock layers in which the skulls are trapped is actually exactly what Bible-believing geologists would expect to see—even in their finest details—as a result of catastrophic burial of herds of these giant herbivores during the global Flood, only about 4,350 years ago.
Excavating the skulls took much longer than it did to bury their massive owners in the first place.
Meticulously excavated rock layers containing over fifty Triceratops skulls reveals two distinct varieties of Triceratops—supposedly spanning about 2 million years, evolutionary paleontologists say. Scientists from the Museum of the Rockies took several years to complete the work, which they interpret as a record of trends in Triceratops snout evolution. In reality, excavating the skulls took much longer than it did to bury their massive owners in the first place.
The Triceratops, a giant herbivorous dinosaur, up to 30 feet long and nearly 10 feet tall with three horns on its head and a frill on its neck, is the predominant fossilized dinosaur found in eastern Montana’s Hell Creek Formation. Chipping away at a 300-foot column of sedimentary rock for fifteen years, paleontologists have mapped the position of each fossil. In their findings, published in “Evolutionary trends in Triceratops from the Hell Creek Formation, Montana,” they describe the locations and characteristics of not only fossils but also the substrate in which they are found.
Not all Triceratops fossils are the same. While all have the iconic three horns-and-a-frill, the parts vary in their relative sizes and shapes. Not surprisingly, the skull and horn shape did change as Triceratops matured from infancy to adulthood. Whether other variations represent different species or just distinctions based on gender, age, or stage of development remains uncertain. Having found all these skulls from apparently mature animals in the same general location and—in their view—spanning up to two million of years of time, paleontologists conclude that these differences represent distinct species.
The Hell Creek Formation has preserved two distinct morphologies of Triceratops along with some minor variations. Triceratops horridus has a short horn on the end of its snout above an elongated beak-like rostrum. Conversely Triceratops prorus has a taller horn on the end of its snout and a shorter rostrum. Lots of Triceratops horridus were recovered in a deeper part of this sequence of rock layers, and lots of Triceratops prorus were found higher up. Triceratops deeper in the sequence also seemed to have more variability in the size of their brow horns than the ones in the upper layers.
“We went out and looked at where the fossils came from in context of the rock formation,” [explains] John Scannella, lead author of the study . . . “The ones found low in the formation look different from the ones found high up, there was a small nasal horn down low and big nasal horns up high, and in the middle features of both,” he said. “This striking change in physical display suggests they evolved, though it's difficult to say what drove the change.”
Whether these variations represent distinct species or an array of variations among interbreeding Triceratops, all are just varieties of Triceratops. These snout shape variations are the not-unexpected variations seen within an animal kind and are no more evolutionary in nature than the variations among Darwin’s finches. (Read more about how natural selection results in finch variety in “Reverse Evolution Causes Darwin’s Finches to Go Missing?” “Building a Beak,” and “Reverse Evolution Causes Darwin’s Finches to Go Missing?”) Such variations do not take a million years to develop. Dramatic variations and speciation, biological observations demonstrate, can occur very rapidly in living animals, and there is no reason to think biology worked any differently in the past. There is nothing about the discovery that demonstrates these distinctions were segregated in time or took a couple of million years to achieve. In fact, there is plenty to indicate otherwise!
But what about the supposed two million year span? Did it really take 1–2 million years for the Triceratops herds in what is now Montana to tweak their snouts? And what was the evolutionary driving force for such a change? Why would Triceratops with a longer nasal horn and shorter beak have a better shot at survival and therefore be selected for than the shorter-horned variety? The “function” of the frills and horns on these animals is unknown in the first place, so evolutionists really have no idea what selective pressure could have driven a change in morphology.
Answers in Genesis geologist Dr. Andrew Snelling commented on the study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences:
All of their interpretation of the supposed evolutionary history of the genus Triceratops hinges totally on the uniformitarian slow-and gradual interpretation of the deposition of the Hell Creek Formation. They claim it required 1–2 million years to accumulate the 90-meter-thick (295 feet) sequences of sands, silts and clays making up the Upper Cretaceous Hell Creek Formation.
Yet their published stratigraphic column of the Hell Creek Formation shows 15–16 fining upwards units, often commencing with medium-grained sand and fining upwards to fine sand and/or to clays, or silts fining upwards to clays. Additionally, their subdivisions of the formation into lower, middle, and upper thirds shows that these divisions are unconformity bounded, the upper third also consisting of two unconformity-bounded sections.
This is equivalent to 15–16 cycles of deposition, with four of those involving basal erosion as the first medium-grained sand bed was deposited in each of those four cycles. In each of these 15–16 depositional cycles the water current had to have slowed down to progressively deposit the finer grains.
Sedimentological experiments clearly indicate that such deposition of fining upwards beds does not require long periods of time, especially when the individual beds are 6–8 meters (20–26 feet) thick or less and there is a sustained sediment supply and water flow. And even clays do not take long to be transported and deposited, since experimental evidence has demonstrated that the fine clay particles flocculate into larger clumps that then are rapidly transported and deposited like sand grains.
The latest news from the world of the Triceratops fits the biblical history of the global Flood.
Thus, the latest news from the world of the Triceratops fits the biblical history of the global Flood that destroyed all the land animals on earth except those representatives of each kind preserved on Noah’s Ark. The types of sediments and the way they are arranged—when compared with experimental observations of the way water-borne sediments are deposited and how long such processes take—is consistent with the expected pattern produced by surging waters catastrophically rising to engulf the earth’s surface during the global Flood. Dr. Snelling shares his conclusion:
Therefore, the Hell Creek Formation can instead be interpreted, and should be interpreted based on the veracity of the biblical eyewitness account, as a series of sediment layers deposited rapidly within hours to a day within the global Flood cataclysm.
On that basis these 50 or so Triceratops fossils with slightly varying morphologies were simply buried in these rapidly accumulating sediments in this apparent order within hours to a day. So there is absolutely no evolutionary development here at all, just variations within the Triceratops genus that all lived at the same time being buried in these sediment layers on one day during the Flood.
Remember, if you see a news story that might merit some attention, let us know about it! (note: if the story originates from the Associated Press, FOX News, MSNBC, the New York Times, or another major national media outlet, we will most likely have already heard about it.) And thanks to all of our readers who have submitted great news tips to us. If you didn’t catch all the latest News to Know, why not take a look to see what you’ve missed?