Rejecting the historical Adam comes with serious theological consequences.
Responding to Hugh Ross’ Old-Earth Arguments
If you just connect all the dots, isn’t it easy to see how the first humans could evolve from a shared ancestor with the apes?
Does Dr. Ross’s view (particularly about the origin the earth, sun, moon, and stars) really stand up to scrutiny with an open Bible?
Why biblical creation is the answer to today’s worldview crisis.
When we deny the existence of a literal Adam, we undermine the very authority of Scripture.
The controversies regarding the early chapters of Genesis and the geological discoveries and theories were part of a complex movement of thought which pulsed through the educated minds of Europeans.
As Christians think about the origin and history of the universe and everything in it, it is important to distinguish between God’s original work of creation and his work of providence since.
God’s commentary on the Sabbath refutes all long-age theories.
At some point, everyone struggles with tragedy. Without the Bible’s account of creation, there are no good answers.
Christians who believe in the literal historical existence and fall of Adam should also believe that God created everything in six literal days about 6,000 years ago.
A defense of only the historical Adam without the rest of the creation account is incomplete.
All old-earth interpretations of Genesis unintentionally assault the character of God, undermine the truth and authority of Scripture, and subvert the gospel.
How Old and New Testament authors, Jesus, and we should understand the genre of Genesis 1–11, and why it’s vital to a proper biblical hermeneutic.
Today, most people in the world, including most people in the Church, take for granted that the earth and universe are millions and millions of years old.
It is claimed that the Bible does not deal with the issue of the age of mankind or even how man came into existence.
Can the evolutionist view of the history of natural evil be harmonized with the Bible’s apparent teaching that all of this evil is the consequence of the Fall?
Problems with progressive creation, including non-historical reading of Genesis 1, multiple animal creation events, manlike creatures before Adam & others
A geology historian’s book review of “The Grand Canyon, Monument to an Ancient Earth” and why its arguments should fail to convince a careful Bible student.
William Lane Craig has done much good for the church, but he has strayed far from the truth on the question of origins.
This is a summary of the historical development of the modern uniformitarian view of the geological record and the millions-of-years time-scale.
PDF DownloadOld-earthers claim Augustine as support for figurative interpretations of Genesis 1. But what did Augustine really say?
Many people who have written on Genesis 1 have attempted to make a very significant distinction between two Hebrew words found there.
PDF DownloadNobody should minimize the danger of errors, especially when we teach error to others.
What does the Intelligent Design movement get right, and what does it leave out?
Evangelicals typically balk at human authorities who ignore God’s Word. Now some Old Testament scholars are effectively denying the clarity of Scripture.
Was Genesis 1 written from the perspective of “God’s time,” unlike the rest of Scripture?
Most Christians at least give lip-service to following Christ. But what about His view of the Old Testament?
Nature reveals so much more about God’s character than a few hints we might easily overlook.
„Evolution ist Wissenschaft, Schöpfung ist Religion“ – haben Sie das auch schon gehört oder vielleicht sogar selber gesagt?
What is the most compelling scientific evidence of a young earth? Many new materials have been produced by young-earth creationists to help answer the question.
Did the Flood really happen? Or is it a myth? Was it global? Or was it a local flood described in hyperbole? Was it a peaceful flood? And does it matter anyway?
Some respected Christian leaders, famous for defending the fundamentals of the faith against compromise, were guilty of their own compromise.
The denial of the clarity of Genesis undermines the authority of Genesis—which undermines the authority of the entire Bible! The rejection of the clear, authoritative teaching of Genesis about how and when God created has significantly contributed to the moral and spiritual decadence into which America has descended.
So few pastors are preaching on Genesis. Before we can help, we need to understand what might be holding a pastor back.
Naturalism, or philosophical naturalism, is one of the most popular religions in the world today, although most people don’t recognize it as such.
Does it really matter what we believe about Adam? Yes it does! There are enormous moral and spiritual implications of these truths.
How should you respond as a faithful witness for Christ when in a gospel-oriented conversation with an atheist?
Some Christians claim Noah’s Flood was local, and it doesn’t really matter what we believe about it. Does this view hold water?
As we trace the history of this idea of millions of years, we will see that it is the product of speculation rooted in anti-biblical philosophical assumptions.
Many old-earth creationists (OEC) try to get around young-earth creationist arguments about there being no death (animal or human) before Adam sinned.
Do trillions of artifacts found in Africa and elsewhere prove that the young-earth creation view is ridiculous?
A vast number of conservative theologians accept animal death before Adam’s Fall.
In a blog post for The Gospel Coalition, Justin Taylor presented his reasons for doubting that the days of creation in Genesis 1 were literal 24-hour days.
Few people have actually read the works of Darwin, and if they did they might be shocked to read some of Darwin’s ideas.
“Why make such a big deal about the age of the earth? It’s so divisive!”
BioLogos attempts to convince Christians to believe in evolution and millions of years and reject the clear teaching of the inerrant Word of God.
The creature Pakicetus was initially regarded as a primitive whale, while further analysis confirms it was a land-dwelling mammal.
The fossil record falsifies the theory of evolution, but it confirms the teaching of Genesis 1.
Charles Darwin’s anti-biblical, naturalistic worldview assumptions controlled his interpretations of what he saw in the world
Last week in Bolivia, AiG held some very full days of presenting creation apologetics talks in the city of Santa Cruz.
Thankfully, there is no reason to fear demons.
Dr. Terry Mortenson, AiG-U.S., responds to a recent blog post by Dr. Peter Enns that strongly accused Ken Ham of teaching obvious error and misleading Christians.
We must consider why the scriptural geologists wrote on this subject, summarize the contemporary reactions to their writings, and then analyze the reasons for the reactions of their opponents.
All the scriptural geologists in the early 19th century believed that Genesis 1–11 provided a divinely inspired and historically accurate account of the origin and early history of the world.
Though virtually unknown in discussions of the scriptural geologists, William Rhind’s geological qualifications enabled him to debate the issues of his day.
Young had an obvious love for the study of geology and saw it not as a threat, but as an aid to faith.
John has been completely overlooked by historians, and his works related to the Genesis-geology debate were largely ignored by contemporary old-earth proponents.
Fairholme did not discuss at length his view of the Bible. But clearly he held to the traditional Christian view of the inspiration, infallibility, and inerrancy of Scripture.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.