Embracing Christ’s View of Scripture

Biblical Authority

by Dr. Terry Mortenson on July 1, 2013; last featured July 24, 2019
Featured in Answers Magazine

Most Christians at least give lip-service to following Christ. But what about His view of the Old Testament? How highly did He esteem its claims, both in His life and in His teaching, and do we embrace Scripture with the same zeal?

How extensively did Jesus trust and live by the Scriptures, which in His day were only the books of the Old Testament? How did He treat them in comparison to other claims of truth? After all, if Jesus is our Savior and Lord, shouldn’t we share the same view?

Factual History

Jesus trusted the Scriptures completely, and He revealed His trust in a number of ways. One is the way He treated the Old Testament’s historical accounts. He always treated them as trustworthy facts, even the events that many people today consider to be myths.

Jesus acknowledged that Adam and Eve were the first married couple (Matthew 19:3–6; Mark 10:3–9) and Abel was the first prophet and was martyred (Luke 11:50–51). He believed the accounts of Noah and the Flood (Matthew 24:37–39), Lot and his wife (Luke 17:28–32), Sodom and Gomorrah (Matthew 10:15), Moses and the serpent in the wilderness (John 3:14), the manna from heaven (John 6:32– 33, 6:49), the miracles of Elijah (Luke 4:25–27), Jonah and the big fish (Matthew 12:40–41)—the list goes on.

Jesus did not allegorize these accounts but took them as real events that actually happened just as the Old Testament describes. He used these past events to reassure His disciples that the future events of His own death, Resurrection, and Second Coming would likewise certainly happen in time-space reality.

Unshakeable Truth in Its Entirety

In John 10:34–35, Jesus said, “Scripture cannot be broken.” That is, not only is the Bible’s historical record accurate, but in prophecy, morality, theology, and every other teaching the Scriptures cannot be contradicted or confounded. In Luke 24:25–27, Jesus rebuked His disciples for not believing all that “the prophets” had spoken (which He equated with “all the Scriptures”). So, in Jesus’s view, all Scripture is trustworthy and should be believed.

Authority for Life

Jesus constantly quoted Scripture as a basis for His own teaching about how to live, such as church discipline (Matthew 18:16), marriage (Matthew 19:3–9), God’s requirements for eternal life (Matthew 19:16–19), and the greatest commandment (Matthew 22:37–39).

No standard is higher than Scripture for what we are to believe or obey. For Jesus all the Scriptures were trustworthy and authoritative.

He used the Old Testament to justify cleansing the temple (Matthew 21:12–17) and picking grain on the Sabbath (Luke 6:3–4). He relied on Scripture, the sword of the Spirit (Ephesians 6:17), to resist the temptations of Satan (Matthew 4:1–10). And He stated unambiguously that the Old Testament supersedes all manmade traditions and ideas. No standard is higher than Scripture for what we are to believe and obey (Matthew 15:1–9; Mark 7:5–13). There is no evidence that Jesus picked and chose some parts of the Old Testament, such as the so-called theological, moral, or religious portions, and rejected others. For Him, all the Scriptures were trustworthy and authoritative, down to the last letter (Matthew 5:18).

Understandable as Written

We never find Jesus appealing to a higher authority to bring out some “hidden meaning” of Scripture. Jesus indicates that the Scriptures are essentially perspicuous (clear for the nonscholar to understand). Eleven times the Gospel writers record Him saying, “Have you not read . . . ?”1 and thirty times He defended His teaching by saying, “It is written.”2 He rebuked His listeners for not understanding and believing what the text plainly says.

Foundational to the Gospel

Jesus also said that believing the writings of Moses was foundational to believing His words (John 5:45–47). Like all the apostles and prophets, He clearly viewed the Bible’s history as foundational to its theology and morality.

Besides the above-mentioned evidence that Jesus took Genesis 1–11 as straightforward, reliable history, several of His statements show that He believed in a literal six-day creation a few thousand years ago and the global Flood at the time of Noah. Most Christians who advocate millions of years of history, however, seem to overlook these statements.3

As the Son of Man, Jesus set us an example in His complete trust in Scripture’s reliability and in His submission to its supreme authority. His promise that the Holy Spirit would lead His apostles into the truth (John 16:13) and those apostles’ declaration that they wrote under divine inspiration (see 2 Peter 3:16) show that Jesus’s view of the Old Testament also applies to the New Testament. Are you following His example?

Discussion Questions

  1. In his temptation of Jesus (Matthew 4:1–11), Satan applied Old Testament verses in a literal way. Did Jesus correct Satan’s literal interpretation of the meaning of these verses, or did He show how Satan’s literal application was wrong? How do you know?
  2. What do 2 Timothy 4:1–4 and 2 Peter 1:16–21 tell you about Paul’s and Peter’s attitudes toward fables or myths? How does this contrast with their view of Scripture?
  3. Some Christian scholars today are denying a literal Adam and a literal Fall. What do these verses tell you about the views of Jesus and the apostles on this subject: Mark 10:6; Luke 3:23, 3:36–38; Romans 5:12?
  4. Why does it matter whether Adam and his Fall were literal? See 1 Corinthians 15:22 and 15:45.
  5. Like Jesus (Matthew 24:37–39), Peter viewed Noah’s Flood as a global judgment (2 Peter 3:3–7). How could denying that event affect a person’s attitude about the coming judgment?
  6. In light of Matthew 16:1–23, Galatians 2:11–14, and Mark 7:5–13, what should we think or do when respected Christian leaders or theologians contradict what the Bible clearly teaches?*

* In your reflections consider this: http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v7/n2/evangelical-popes

Dr. Terry Mortenson is a well-known speaker and writer for Answers in Genesis–USA. He earned his doctorate in the history of geology from Coventry University in England, and his master of divinity degree from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Chicago.

Related Downloads

Embracing Christ’s View of Scripture: Discussion Questions

PDF Download

Coming to Grips with Genesis Excerpt: Chapter 11

PDF Download

Answers Magazine

July – September 2013

To say that the human brain is more amazing than a computer misses the point. We now know that it’s nothing like a computer— and far more powerful! In this issue of Answers you’ll learn why a computer will never match the human brain. Also, discover why the big bang is a theory in crisis, what the Bible says about women in combat, and much more!

Browse Issue Subscribe


  1. In these instances Jesus referred to Genesis 1–2; Exodus 3–6; 1 Samuel 21:6; Psalm 8:2; Psalm 118:22; and unspecified Levitical law—in other words, to passages from the historical narrative, the Law, and the poetry of Scripture.
  2. Passages He specifically cited were from all five books of the Pentateuch, as well as Psalms, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zechariah, and Malachi.
  3. http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/1101ankerberg_response.asp, 1 Nov. 2004, and chapter 11 in Terry Mortenson and Thane H. Ury, eds., Coming to Grips with Genesis (Master Books, 2008).


Get the latest answers emailed to you.

I agree to the current Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.

Learn more

  • Customer Service 800.778.3390