Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson Articles

• Finding Adam in the Genome: A BioLogos cover-up?

  

  Aug. 17, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  Venema took Tomkins’ claims to task on the BioLogos website regarding the supposed remnants of an egg-laying gene (vitellogenin) in human DNA.

• Finding Adam in the Genome: Does BioLogos Have Even More Egg on Its Face?

  

  Aug. 10, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  BioLogos has engaged in systematic scientific error on one of their “evidences” for evolution, and they have misrepresented the arguments for several years.

• Do Humans Have Genes for Laying Eggs?

  

  Aug. 3, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  In this article, we explore Venema’s claims in Adam and the Genome about genetic sequences that he thinks have lost their function.

• Finding Adam in the Genome: Part 3 of a Response to Chapter 2 of Adam and the Genome

  

  July 6, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  Venema claims that the published, comprehensive genetic comparisons between humans and chimpanzees reveal a genetic identity of 95–98%.

• Finding Adam in the Genome: Part 2 of a Response to Chapter 2 (and Chapter 4) of Adam and the Genome

  

  June 29, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  In our series, we’ve discovered ample support that evolutionists fit facts to conclusions. In this article, we’ll continue to explore whether it is true.

• Finding Adam in the Genome: Part 1 of a Response to Chapter 2 (and Chapter 4) of Adam and the Genome

  

  June 22, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  In this post, we begin exploring Venema’s evidences in chapter two of Adam and the Genome, titled “Genomes as Language, Genomes as Books.”

• Finding Adam in the Genome: A Response to Chapter 1 of Adam and the Genome

  

  June 15, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  In this article, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson reviews chapter 1 (written by Venema and titled “Evolution as a Scientific Theory”) of Adam and the Genome.

• Creationists Are Liars? Finding Adam in the Genome with BioLogos

  

  June 8, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  It appears that Venema fits facts to his preconceived conclusions. Data and facts from YEC scientists that contradicted his claims were left out.

• Finding Adam in the Genome: A Response to Adam and the Genome

  

  April 27, 2017 from A Response to Adam and the Genome

  The recent publication of Adam and the Genome illustrated how evolutionists find new and more nuanced ways to contradict the biblical account.

• In-Depth Article

  Does BioLogos Strive for Dialogue?

  

  Oct. 10, 2016 from Answers in Depth

  Duff’s article explicitly and exclusively focuses on criticizing the YEC view of speciation, rather than on supporting the evolutionary view.

• Magazine Article

  Three Puzzles Evolution Can’t Solve

  

  Oct. 9, 2016 from Answers Magazine

  For more than a century Christians have looked for the scientific silver bullet that would destroy Darwinian evolution and prove biblical creation to be true.

• Why Don’t More People Accept the Young-Earth View of Speciation?

  Aug. 6, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  All of these data together lead to testable scientific predictions that put the evolutionary and old-earth creation models to shame.

• Did Natural Selection Play a Role in Speciation?

  July 30, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  When God created the kinds, He frontloaded them with genetic differences—with the potential to form all sorts of new species and varieties.

• Getting Enough Genetic Diversity

  July 23, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  The major remaining question is how tens of thousands of species could arise in a few thousand years.

• Getting Enough Bodies

  July 16, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  We need to know how these Ark ancestors can multiply fast enough to generate enough bodies to possess these new traits.

• A Spectacular Confirmation of Darwin’s Argument—for Genesis

  July 9, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Since species are defined by traits and characteristics that are heritable, the origin of species is a fundamentally genetic question.

• Did Darwin Argue That Species Originated Recently?

  July 2, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Careful reexamination of the first two chapters of Darwin’s seminal work, On the Origin of Species, leads to a surprising conclusion.

• Response to World and Marvin Olasky

  June 25, 2016

  Despite his Herculean reading, his conclusions and advice to creationists illustrate the limits of analyzing a movement from a distance.

• Tracing the Fate of the Animals that Survived the Post-Flood Extinction

  June 18, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Today’s species are the link between the past and the present. The genetics of the species around us today contain the echo of the Ark.

• What Happened to the Animals After Noah’s Ark?

  June 11, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  After the animals Noah took on board the Ark survived the Flood and stepped off the ship around 4,500 years ago, where did they go? What was their fate?

• When Did the Animals Exit the Ark?

  June 4, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  If you search Genesis 1–11, you won’t find an explicit time stamp for the disembarking event. So when did the Ark land? When did animals restart their lives?

• Which Animals Were On the Ark with Noah?

  May 28, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Male and female animals were on board Noah’s Ark to reproduce after the Flood. This has profound ramifications for identifying what the kinds looked like.

• Can We Find Noah’s Animals . . . in the Modern World?

  May 14, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  The more we learn about the origin of species, the more we know about Noah’s Ark. The Flood reverberates to the present day in the form of genetics.

• A Follow-up Response to Professor Keathley’s Erroneous Claims

  

  March 31, 2016 from Why Do So Many Reject Creation Science?

  If Keathley is unable or unwilling to get the most basic facts right about his opponents, should he be taken seriously when he tries to criticize them?

No results found in .