The Christian worldview is not a mere assumption. It is the worldview that makes knowledge possible (Proverbs 1:7; Colossians 2:3). It alone provides the justification for those things we need for reasoning—such as laws of logic and uniformity.
Logic is a very valuable tool, particularly for the Christian who wants to defend his or her faith better. Mistakes in reasoning are called “logical fallacies,” and they abound in origins debates.
The straw-man fallacy is when a person misrepresents his opponent’s position and then proceeds to refute that misrepresentation rather than what his opponent actually claims.
Logic can be a valuable tool for Christians to defend their faith. But mistakes in reasoning can derail even the best argument.
We are right only because God has taught us to know what is right. How quickly we can forget that.
We will close out the logical fallacy series with two of the most common fallacies that occur in arguments about origins.
Quote mining means fudging facts or leaving out crucial details that misrepresent the meaning of the quote.
Christians must be vigilant to exercise sound reasoning—which a biblical worldview enables in the first place.
Even when we know they’re not true, arguments that rely on propaganda and flawed logic can still sound incredibly persuasive.
Even when we know they’re not true, arguments that rely on propaganda and flawed logic can still sound incredibly persuasive.
Can the scientific method really “prove” things? To find out, let’s look at the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
What does it really mean to be an expert, anyway? If we can’t rely 100% on anybody, how can we speak with confidence outside the Bible?
Many people have the impression that Christians live in two “worlds”—the world of faith and the world of reason.
Are the laws of logic really laws, or are they just descriptors? Darius and Karin Viet, AiG–U.S., explain.
Bodie Hodge, AiG–U.S., responds to the claim that belief in biblical creationism is “so illogical and wrong that it’s hilarious.”
Does Ken Ham’s reasoning represent examples of affirming the consequent and reification? Jeremy Ham, AiG–U.S., explains.
If you think a course in logic sounds dry, abstract, and complicated— best left to intellectuals—the new book Discerning Truth will probably change your mind.
An evolutionist mocks the Bible and criticizes Dr. Lisle. Bodie Hodge, AiG–U.S., addresses these issues.
Do logic and truth really depend upon the Bible being true? Couldn’t atheists just invent a story to explain them? Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., shows why this is impossible.
Great civilizations accomplished amazing things without believing in God, so why must He exist for logic to be true?
Can the Bible truly “speak”? Why was there a Garden of Eden in a perfect earth? Jason Lisle and Bodie Hodge provide insight.
This occurs when a person misrepresents an opponent’s position and then proceeds to refute that misrepresentation rather than what the opponent actually claims.
Essentially, the faulty appeal to authority is the argument that a claim is true simply because someone else believes it.
The ad hominmen fallacy is so named because it directs an argument against the person making a claim rather than the claim itself.
Is Christianity logical? As Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., shows, not only is Christianity logical, it is foundational for all logic.
A person commits this fallacy when he or she claims that there are only two mutually exclusive possibilities—when, in fact, there is a third option.
The complex question is the interrogative form of begging the question—when the arguer attempts to persuade by asking a loaded question.
With the question-begging epithet, the arguer uses biased (often emotional) language to persuade people rather than using logic.
This fallacy is committed when a person merely assumes what he is attempting to prove, or when the premise of an argument actually depends upon its conclusion.
Most words have more than one meaning, but only one of these meanings will properly fit the given context.
Reification is attributing a concrete characteristic to something that is abstract.
Logic is a very valuable tool, particularly for the Christian who wants to defend his or her faith better.
Are the laws of logic truly universal? Must a person choose between logic or faith? Have we moved beyond superstition? Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., responds to a critic’s challenge.
Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., shows why a universe with stability and laws of logic requires the biblical God—even hypothetical ones.
AiG has made the claim that science requires a biblical worldview. Is this logically defensible?
What are the limits of logic and is logic more important than God’s Word?
Did God create logic? Or is logic further evidence of God’s existence?
The universe is full of change; almost everything in the physical universe is constantly changing. Yet, we all assume that the laws of nature do not.
The fast succession of irrelevant questions is a well-known logical fallacy known as a “loaded question.”
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.