The Christian worldview is not a mere assumption. It is the worldview that makes knowledge possible (Proverbs 1:7; Colossians 2:3). It alone provides the justification for those things we need for reasoning—such as laws of logic and uniformity.
Logic is a very valuable tool, particularly for the Christian who wants to defend his or her faith better. Mistakes in reasoning are called “logical fallacies,” and they abound in origins debates.
The straw-man fallacy is when a person misrepresents his opponent’s position and then proceeds to refute that misrepresentation rather than what his opponent actually claims.
Logic can be a valuable tool for Christians to defend their faith. But mistakes in reasoning can derail even the best argument.
Could reality be a simulation, and could virtual reality be as genuine as physical reality?
Why a biblical worldview—but not naturalism—can provide a foundation for logic, knowledge, and morality.
Why the biblical worldview is the only answer to the problem of induction.
Why the biblical worldview is the only answer to the problem of induction.
We are right only because God has taught us to know what is right. How quickly we can forget that.
We will close out the logical fallacy series with two of the most common fallacies that occur in arguments about origins.
Quote mining means fudging facts or leaving out crucial details that misrepresent the meaning of the quote.
Christians must be vigilant to exercise sound reasoning—which a biblical worldview enables in the first place.
Even when we know they’re not true, arguments that rely on propaganda and flawed logic can still sound incredibly persuasive.
Even when we know they’re not true, arguments that rely on propaganda and flawed logic can still sound incredibly persuasive.
Can the scientific method really “prove” things? To find out, let’s look at the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
What does it really mean to be an expert, anyway? If we can’t rely 100% on anybody, how can we speak with confidence outside the Bible?
Many people have the impression that Christians live in two “worlds”—the world of faith and the world of reason.
Are the laws of logic really laws, or are they just descriptors? Darius and Karin Viet, AiG–U.S., explain.
Does Ken Ham’s reasoning represent examples of affirming the consequent and reification? Jeremy Ham, AiG–U.S., explains.
If you think a course in logic sounds dry, abstract, and complicated— best left to intellectuals—the new book Discerning Truth will probably change your mind.
Do logic and truth really depend upon the Bible being true? Couldn’t atheists just invent a story to explain them? Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., shows why this is impossible.
Great civilizations accomplished amazing things without believing in God, so why must He exist for logic to be true?
This occurs when a person misrepresents an opponent’s position and then proceeds to refute that misrepresentation rather than what the opponent actually claims.
Essentially, the faulty appeal to authority is the argument that a claim is true simply because someone else believes it.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.