Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
In an attempt to discredit the Bible, New Scientist tells us that God’s Word is full of errors. The question is: how did the article pass editorial review?
What makes evolution so persistent, ironically, is the malleability of the outcomes involved in the belief in non-teleological origins.
Could creation cosmologies shed light on recent unexplained phenomena in our solar system?
What does a math test tell us about the power of materialistic beliefs to impact behavior? Quite a bit, as it turns out.
Many skeptics have accused us of not having a forum because we’re afraid our beliefs can’t stand up to opposition. The webteam responds.
No results found in .