Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
Neanderthal labyrinth in non-Neanderthal fossil hints at maze of post-Babel migrations.
How can you tell a fossilized skull belonged to a Neanderthal? The comparatively large size and prominent brow ridges? Actually—until now at least—paleoanthropologists have looked at a more subtle feature: the shape of the labyrinth in the inner ear. This bony chamber cradles the human body’s balance organ—the semicircular canals—within the temporal bones on each side of the skull. The Neanderthal bony labyrinth differs from that of modern humans and other archaic humans in a suite of subtle but specific ways long deemed diagnostic of Neanderthals. But not anymore!
This discovery has shown some evolutionary anthropologists that their view of human lineages and migratory patterns is oversimplified. According to Washington University paleoanthropologist Erik Trinkhaus, the truth about human relationships and historical geography is much more of a labyrinth than evolutionary anthropologists have imagined.
The bony home of the inner ear in Xujiayao 15, an archaic human’s skull recovered 35 years ago in East Asia, matches that of Neanderthals, but Xujiayao 15 was not Neanderthal. “We were very surprised,” Trinkaus says, because “it looks like a Neanderthal,’” adding, “It's clearly not modern human.” The bony labyrinths of other archaic humans more nearly resemble those of modern humans. “We fully expected the [CT] scan to reveal a temporal labyrinth that looked much like a modern human one,” Trinkhaus says, “but what we saw was clearly typical of a Neanderthal.”
Your inner ear consists of the spiral-shaped cochlea—which transmits sound to your brain—and three semicircular canals (plus a saccule and utricle) for balance—sort of a biological gyroscope. The semicircular canals—each roughly 2/3 of a circle and about 1.5 mm in diameter—are oriented in three dimensions at right angles to each other. The shifting of fluid within them pushes against sensory structures to detect changes in angular momentum (rotation). These semicircular canals are part of the bony labyrinth embedded within the petrous portion (“stone” bone) of the skull’s temporal bone. Therefore the shape of the semicircular canals is often preserved in a fossilized skull. High-resolution CT scans can measure these canals and map their relative positions.
Neanderthal semicircular canals have characteristic proportions and positions that subtly differ from those in most other archaic humans and modern humans.1 Paleoanthropologists have long considered the characteristic Neanderthal semicircular canals to be diagnostic—a reliable litmus test to identify a skull as Neanderthal.2
So what does Trinkhaus think about this discovery’s implications? He remains cautious and says that for now the implications are unclear:
The study of human evolution has always been messy, and these findings just make it all the messier. It shows that human populations in the real world don't act in nice simple patterns. . . . It suggests, instead, that the later phases of human evolution were more of a labyrinth of biology and peoples than simple lines on maps would suggest.”3
Over are the days of assuming that this semicircular canal configuration is a defining characteristic of a Neanderthal, Trinkhaus makes clear:
You can't rely on one anatomical feature or one piece of DNA as the basis for sweeping assumptions about the migrations of hominid species from one place to another. What these findings say to me are that characteristics were probably more varied in ancient human populations than we think. We see characteristics mix and match in populations across the world nowadays, and I believe that characteristics shuffled back and forth in ancient human populations across the landscape over centuries and millennia. The idea of distinct, separate lineages in this time period in human evolution is meaningless—it was much more of a labyrinth than that.
Following the global Flood and dispersal from the Tower of Babel, the descendants of Noah’s family dispersed. Some isolated groups of people would have developed distinguishing traits, but all were still human. That there is overlap of some of these features is no surprise, as all these people were descended from Noah’s sons and their wives. And though people emigrated away from the Tower of Babel, intermarriage between groups would be no surprise, and thus the sporadic occurrence of traits not normally associated with certain groups would be expected.
Learn more about the labyrinthine dispersal of people and what we can learn about their descendants that dispersed through the world from the plains of Shinar in “Was the Dispersion at Babel a Real Event?” Biblical history makes sense of the maze of migrations, which have nothing at all to do with human evolution. Neanderthals and other archaic humans were just as human as the person each of you sees in the mirror.
Remember, if you see a news story that might merit some attention, let us know about it! (note: if the story originates from the Associated Press, FOX News, MSNBC, the New York Times, or another major national media outlet, we will most likely have already heard about it.) And thanks to all of our readers who have submitted great news tips to us. If you didn’t catch all the latest News to Know, why not take a look to see what you’ve missed?
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively. We focus on providing answers to questions about the Bible—particularly the book of Genesis—regarding key issues such as creation, evolution, science, and the age of the earth.