Dr. Nathaniel T. Jeanson Articles

• A Spectacular Confirmation of Darwin’s Argument—for Genesis

  July 9, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Since species are defined by traits and characteristics that are heritable, the origin of species is a fundamentally genetic question.

• Did Darwin Argue That Species Originated Recently?

  July 2, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Careful reexamination of the first two chapters of Darwin’s seminal work, On the Origin of Species, leads to a surprising conclusion.

• Response to World and Marvin Olasky

  June 25, 2016

  Despite his Herculean reading, his conclusions and advice to creationists illustrate the limits of analyzing a movement from a distance.

• Tracing the Fate of the Animals that Survived the Post-Flood Extinction

  June 18, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Today’s species are the link between the past and the present. The genetics of the species around us today contain the echo of the Ark.

• What Happened to the Animals After Noah’s Ark?

  June 11, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  After the animals Noah took on board the Ark survived the Flood and stepped off the ship around 4,500 years ago, where did they go? What was their fate?

• When Did the Animals Exit the Ark?

  June 4, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  If you search Genesis 1–11, you won’t find an explicit time stamp for the disembarking event. So when did the Ark land? When did animals restart their lives?

• Which Animals Were On the Ark with Noah?

  May 28, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  Male and female animals were on board Noah’s Ark to reproduce after the Flood. This has profound ramifications for identifying what the kinds looked like.

• Can We Find Noah’s Animals . . . in the Modern World?

  May 14, 2016 from The Origin of Species After the Flood

  The more we learn about the origin of species, the more we know about Noah’s Ark. The Flood reverberates to the present day in the form of genetics.

• A Follow-up Response to Professor Keathley’s Erroneous Claims

  

  March 31, 2016 from Why Do So Many Reject Creation Science?

  If Keathley is unable or unwilling to get the most basic facts right about his opponents, should he be taken seriously when he tries to criticize them?

• When Hostility Helps

  March 31, 2016 from Why Do So Many Reject Creation Science?

  Brandon Ambrosino's article about AiG undermines his own position—and illustrates how hostile media often help the very activities they’re trying to oppose.

• Does Ken Ham Embrace Evolution?

  March 30, 2016 from Why Do So Many Reject Creation Science?

  Kenneth Keathley distinguishes our view from universal common ancestry, but putting “Ken Ham Embraces Evolution” as the title of his post is highly misleading.

• In-Depth Article

  Differences Between Chimp and Human DNA Recalculated

  Sept. 17, 2015 from Answers in Depth

  Some assert that humans and chimpanzees are only 1 to 2% different, but careful re-tallying suggests there is a gigantic genetic gap between the two species.

No results found in .