Although astronomers who accept the billions-of-years view of the universe’s age believe stars are still forming, they do not actually know how. They believe swirling hydrogen gas cools and condenses until it is dense enough to possess enough gravity to prevent re-expansion. The truth is astronomers have never actually observed the birth of a single star.
Even though God ceased creating on Day Six, we occasionally see islands, mountains, rivers, and canyons form today. Could stars occasionally form in a similar manner today? God could have made gas clouds already in the process of collapse to form stars, or God could have ordained processes whereby stars occasionally form.
In past generations, telling time by the stars was an essential part of life. It is really pretty easy to do. You can even roughly estimate the time by eye, as long as you don’t need high precision.
Some stars burn so brightly that they should soon run out of fuel, while others are relatively cold and would seem to last forever. One type of star in particular—the blue star—is a big problem if you assume the universe came into being 13.7 billion years ago.
A recent headline from a pop science site: “Was the Christmas Star a Real Astronomical Event?”
Recent articles highlighting a photograph from the James Webb Space Telescope claim they’ve captured images of 50 baby stars, “at the moment of birth.”
Have they finally found elusive Population III stars? Well, a recent article claims that scientists might have spotted “the first direct evidence” of these stars.
What is a recurrent nova, and why do astronomers think that it might erupt this year?
Flat-earthers argue that since certain verses in Scripture speak of the stars falling, then the stars will literally fall.
After 29 years of research, a creation astronomer has observable evidence that stars can’t be billions of years old.
Since early times, the human imagination has connected stars into familiar patterns, which we call constellations.
Did this constellation name and idea originate at the same place and from the same people before being scattered throughout the earth?
The secular media often report new evidence of stars in the process of formation. They say this supports star evolution. What do creationists think?
Among the kaleidoscope of stars, brilliant blue stars are of special interest.
With a little practice it’s possible to know the time of night, just by looking at the stars.
Herbig-Haro objects are generally believed to be associated with star formation. Beautifully belching jets hailed as stellar birth announcement.
Star light, star so bright—is this hot spot in the sky churning out stars at record-breaking speed?
Dr. Danny Faulkner, AiG–U.S., explains whether astronomers can see the surfaces of stars and what methods they use.
Astronomers have discovered what news outlets have dubbed a “super-mom.”
A bright blue galaxy: is it bursting with new stars?
Are the stars of NGC 253 bursting in space?
Here and there around the globe, Christians are putting feet to their burden to tell the real message of the stars.
One theory, proposed in the nineteenth century, was that the constellations represent the vestiges of a primal gospel that God gave to early man.
A recent Internet report claimed that researchers caught “infant” stars in the act of “feeding.” But is there more to the story?
PDF DownloadDoes the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram prove that the universe must be millions of years old? Dr. Jason Lisle answers.
The Bible says that the heavens are a ready-made platform for declaring the glory of God and showing His handiwork.
The properties of stars do not suggest an evolutionary origin.
People have always been fascinated by the stars and many have tried to count them.
The Hubble telescope has recently taken some spectacular pictures of stars forming. Doesn't this prove that stars were not created? No, it doesn't.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.