Jesus, the Creator, made it clear that the first marriage between man and woman (Adam and Eve) came at the beginning of creation. If the earth is indeed billions of years old, then the first male and female came nowhere near the beginning of creation. This is a major theological problem.
Is everything reported in a scientific journal automatically as valid as Scripture? What about when the two come into conflict—such as if an archaeologist alleges that the Bible’s history is inaccurate? The church fathers overwhelmingly believed in a recent creation as the Bible taught.
Could God have used evolution? Yes (though the death-focused process is contrary to God’s nature), but it’s not about what He could have done; it’s about what He (not we) said He did. Christians are not called to tell God how He must have created.
When we consider the possibility that God used evolutionary processes to create over millions of years, we are faced with serious consequences.
Troy Lacey, AiG–U.S., responds to a reader who is sad about what AiG teaches.
The Bible states that God is the Prime Cause of all things.
Congressman shares belief that evolutionary teaching creates a stumbling block to understanding our need for our Savior.
We will show why evolutionistic thought is completely foreign to the Bible.
According to a recent survey by Lifeway Research, most Protestant pastors in the United States realize the Bible and evolution don’t mix.
Many Christians think the creation versus evolution controversy isn’t important and that we shouldn’t let it divide the church. They misunderstand the foundational nature of this issue.
Lately, we’ve received a number of letters about a new posting, “Christian Faith Requires Accepting Evolution.” Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell responds.
What existed before the big bang? And can secular scientists and the Roman Catholic Church team up to answer that question?
In a USA Today opinion piece, two Christian evolutionists send a broadside our way.
Two Christian evolutionists send a broadside our way with a USA Today opinion piece this week. But do they bring up anything new?
Is God’s grace revealed through evolution? Or is evolution antithetical to any sort of grace?
A recent article in Third Way Magazine in the United Kingdom suggests that Christians should celebrate Darwinism. But are they deceiving their readers?
The phrase “thank God for evolution” and variations are catching on.
While Pope Benedict XVI is not changing Rome’s general view on evolution, he hs raised some questions.
Many readers have written in to ask us to respond to “Darwin on the Right: Why Christians and conservatives should accept evolution,” by Michael Shermer.
Brett Younger launches into a problematic examination of science and religion and uses the “usual” arguments against young-earth creationism.
This article is a response to another article about evolutionist Christian Dr. Francis Collins (director of the [US] National Human Genome Research Institute), which is riddled with inaccuracies and misleading statements.
"I am writing in about the articule expressing doubt on a PBS evolution program, about sponges being the first animals..."
When someone embraces evolution and rejects the historical authenticity of the Fall, he has no basis for believing he has need of a Savior.
We publish this letter to give readers an idea of the sort of intellectual “laziness” among our critics.
The General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church has passed a resolution reaffirming its support of evolutionary theory.
Conservative US talk-show host Dr Laura Schlessinger expressed her support for the theory of evolution on two recent broadcasts.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.