If all the ingredients necessary for life can occur naturally, does that mean over time they can evolve into a living creature?
Trickle-down chemistry supposedly solves the chemical conundrum concerning the origin of life, but molecules-to-man evolution remains as fictional as ever.
“Water world” is a “geological approach to life’s emergence.”
Without power, the primordial show is over before it starts.
Despite the fact that life has never been observed emerging by random natural processes from non-living elements, most evolutionists are confident that it did.
The stone starter for a nourishing primordial soup remains as lifeless as ever.
Was primordial soup a warm pond or a hot salty ocean? Evolutionists debate.
Carboxydotrophs—microbes that derive their energy from carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide—are said to be a clue to the earth’s early atmosphere.
Evolutionists and creationists alike, watch your language: the supposed “primordial soup” of life’s beginnings is no longer kosher.
The first animals didn’t evolve in the ocean, claims a controversial new study. Instead, the study suggests the earliest animals called a saltwater lake home.
Zzzzzap! All it took was a helping of primordial stew and a bolt of lightning—or perhaps the hot gases of an angry volcano—and, voilà, you’ve got life.
Popular views on evolution include the concept that life originally arose from non-living chemicals through the interaction of matter and energy.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.