Location, Location, Location

by Bodie Hodge on March 23, 2009; last featured September 7, 2023

Why do names of certain places appear both pre-Flood and post-Flood? Does this refute a global Flood that should have destroyed such places?

When we read in Genesis 6–9, it is obvious that there was a global Flood. So, the alleged contradiction is that some pre-Flood place names reappear after the Flood. For example, Table 1 illustrates the most common ones:

Table 1. Pre-Flood and Post-Flood References

NameBible Reference Pre-FloodBible Reference Post-FloodPerson
HavilahGenesis 2:11Genesis 10:7, 29Noah’s grandson through Ham; Noah’s great, great, great, great grandson through Shem
CushGenesis 2:13Genesis 10:6Noah’s grandson through Ham
AsshurGenesis 2:14 (NIV)Genesis 10:22Noah’s grandson through Shem
TigrisGenesis 2:14 (NIV)Genesis 10:4River in modern-day Iraq
EuphratesGenesis 2:14Genesis 15:18River in modern-day Iraq

The answer to this conundrum is quite simple, but let’s use some illustrations so that we can better understand this.

  1. Names of places often transfer. For example, Versailles, Illinois, was named for Versailles, Kentucky, when settlers moved from Kentucky into Illinois. And before that Versailles, Kentucky, was named for Versailles, France. If someone says to meet them in Versailles, you may have to ask, “Which one?”
  2. Names of places often come from names of people as well. The land of Canaan was named for Noah’s grandson Canaan. St. Louis, Missouri, was named for King Louis IX of France.
  3. Names of people sometimes came from places. Consider the name London that many people today have and its origin as a city in England.

With this in mind, it should be fairly easy to see how names could easily have been transferred through the Flood. Ham’s grandson was likely named after the land of Havilah. Cush was Ham’s son, and Asshur was Shem’s son. Noah, Ham, and Shem lived before the Flood and would have been aware of these regions. And, of course, these names have gone on to become names of regions where some of these people settled after the dispersal of the Tower of Babel. Cush is modern-day Ethiopia; Asshur was where Assyria developed into a great nation and so on.

For example, if I were to mention the “Thames River,” most people would quickly think of a river in southern England. However, the state of Connecticut in the U.S. and Ontario, Canada, also have a river named Thames. When people settled in the Americas from Europe, they named some of these rivers for rivers they were familiar with. Why would we expect Noah and his descendants to do any differently? The Tigris and Euphrates that we know today in modern day Iraq were named for the famous headwaters in the Garden of Eden.

There is no contradiction, but merely a situation of renaming new places, rivers, and people with previously used names.

Demolishing Supposed Bible Contradictions: Volume 1

Do you have concerns about Bible passages that have bothered you for years?

Read Online Buy Book
Master Books has graciously granted AiG permission to publish selected chapters of this book online. To purchase a copy please visit our online store.


Get the latest answers emailed to you.

I agree to the current Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.

Learn more

  • Customer Service 800.778.3390