Nature reveals so much more about God’s character than a few hints we might easily overlook.
The design of nature certainly declares something about the Creator. But is it a “sixty-seventh book” of the Bible?
Rejecting the historical Adam comes with serious theological consequences.
Responding to Hugh Ross’ Old-Earth Arguments
If you just connect all the dots, isn’t it easy to see how the first humans could evolve from a shared ancestor with the apes?
Does Dr. Ross’s view (particularly about the origin the earth, sun, moon, and stars) really stand up to scrutiny with an open Bible?
Why biblical creation is the answer to today’s worldview crisis.
When we deny the existence of a literal Adam, we undermine the very authority of Scripture.
The controversies regarding the early chapters of Genesis and the geological discoveries and theories were part of a complex movement of thought which pulsed through the educated minds of Europeans.
As Christians think about the origin and history of the universe and everything in it, it is important to distinguish between God’s original work of creation and his work of providence since.
God’s commentary on the Sabbath refutes all long-age theories.
At some point, everyone struggles with tragedy. Without the Bible’s account of creation, there are no good answers.
Christians who believe in the literal historical existence and fall of Adam should also believe that God created everything in six literal days about 6,000 years ago.
A defense of only the historical Adam without the rest of the creation account is incomplete.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.