The Creator has revealed Himself in both science and history, and the two subjects are intertwined. It is just as wrong to leave God out of the study of bacteria and volcanoes as it is to leave Him out of the rise and fall of nations or the extinction of dinosaurs.
Does a straightforward reading of the Bible restrict God? Simply put, we’re just repeating what God has said about Himself and what He has done. We restrict ourselves to the Bible, rather than accepting secular ideas about origins that are contrary to God’s Word.
A well-known atheist recently claimed that God’s command in Genesis is the root of environmental issues. His words show a lack of understanding of the plain meaning of Scripture. He has read into the word dominion what he wants to see because of his atheistic background. An unbiased reading would not suggest that God’s words in Genesis 1:28 imply that people can do what they like, damaging the environment.
Intolerance against Christians’ freedom to express their Christian worldview is increasing from a minority of secularists who are in positions of authority.
Baptist theologian Dr. John Gill had an essential grasp on how the creation account is extremely important to Christianity in the 1700s. It still is.
Science is a powerful, God-given tool, but only the Bible is true in every aspect.
A well-known atheist recently claimed that God’s command in Genesis is the root of environmental issues, but this skeptic hasn’t done his homework.
Was God “sitting on His throne twiddling His thumbs” for eternity past until a few thousand years ago?
Does a straightforward reading of the Bible restrict God? Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., looks at this oft-repeated claim.
The Creator has revealed Himself in both science and history.
As the world turned its attention to the heavens on December 24, 1968, the Apollo 8 crew turned their eyes to earth and their thoughts to the One who formed it.
Harvard is launching a research project to study how life began.
Many times I’ve heard people tell me something like “God could have used evolution” or “God could have created over millions of years.”
“It’s not a matter of what God could have done, but what He said He did!”
“Now although one must respect others views, beliefs, and opinions, I by my own nature must disagree whole heartedly with the creation story etc.”
Evolutionary scientists seem to delight in coming up with ever more evidence that man is not unique or special in any sense of the word.
From our everyday experience we know that the greater the intelligence and skill of a person making something, the less time is required to make it.
In an effort to link Christianity with the conservation movement, some people portray God as the ‘Original Greenie’ whose chief concern is the preservation of the natural environment.
It was my experience as a new Christian on a university campus to begin my study of the relationship between God’s Word, the Bible, and modern scientific concepts.
The reason that people do not want to accept creation is that it means there is a Creator who sets the rules. Thus, no person can write his own rules.
A message and warning from 2 Peter 3 concerning the rejection in the last days of the belief in God as Creator. This should be a real warning to everyone of the importance of origins.
I now want to look at the most important aspect of Creation; Who is the Creator? How does the Hebrew language of Genesis describe Him?
According to the Bible, the first man was perfect, made in the image of God.
Condensed from a taped lecture by Ivan Bowden Dean of Queensland Bible Institute, given at the Summer Institute of Creation Science 1979/80.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.