The question of whether man is inherently “good” or “evil” has inspired many poets and philosophers to produce a plethora of theater plays, poems, and tales. Human nature is by no means described by the Bible as good.
Atheists tell us that we should be good for goodness sake, that people can be good without God. But they don’t tell us how they know or how they measure what is “good.”
Many evolutionists are quite clear that evolution does not provide a basis for morality. If evolution is true, then there can be no universal moral code that all people should adhere to.
God’s moral standard flows from His unchanging nature. Because God’s nature is perfect and holy, He cannot sin, so His standard is objective. It is impossible for God to contradict Himself or act inconsistently with His own nature.
The Bible is the only source to properly understand our need for government and its real nature.
Biblical Christianity and Darwinian evolution are incompatible both scientifically and morally.
One disgruntled reader accuses Answers in Genesis of seeking to squelch other beliefs to force our morality on people, but as Mark Looy, AiG–U.S., shows, our goal is for others to find true freedom.
Is human morality a product of evolution? It seems that priest-turned-evolutionary scientist Francisco Ayala presumes the answer is “yes.”
If a magnet can scramble one’s ability to make sound moral judgments, does that imply morality is all in our minds?
If any newspaper was to take a lead in propagating the godless morality of naturalistic evolution, in all its fullness, it would have to be The Guardian.
While scientists are fallible like anyone else, research would improve if it were built on biblical ethics and the truth of God's Word.
Only God’s Word, the Bible, establishes the rock-solid basis for goodness.
Countries where evolution is generally accepted often show great acts of charity. Does this mean that morality doesn’t require God?
How is one psychologist answering the loaded question “why did religion evolve?”
It’s not our inner, inherent goodness that leads to morality and good deeds.
Many evolutionists have claimed that no one can deny evolution and be a good doctor. Tommy Mitchell, MD, wonders why a consistent evolutionist would even want to practice medicine.
To most of America’s founding fathers, the Bible was true from beginning to end, and it was the only source upon which to establish the new, independent nation.
Morality is a very difficult problem for the evolutionary worldview. The problem is that evolutionists have no logical reason to believe in right and wrong within their own worldview.
What does a math test tell us about the power of materialistic beliefs to impact behavior? Quite a bit, as it turns out.
What can the story of Barry Bonds tell us about the creation/evolution controversy?
Unlike the computers we use every day, there’s no amount of deleting or reformatting that can remove the sensual images we’ve laid our eyes upon.
The tentacles of pornography have invaded almost every area of our lives.
"A more logical argument would be that a religious position, which by definition transcends logic, absolves the holder from ANY rational restriction on their actions..."
Apart from God’s answers in Genesis, cannot come up with a logikos reason for moral values and rules—yet “sheeple” continue to trust worldly authorities with blind, irrational faith.
"I wish you people would focus on the important matter of maintaining an independent moral authority..."
I heard someone say recently that people should be free to do whatever they want to do as long as they don’t hurt anybody.
The April 2004 cover of Discover magazine poses the question, 'Are Right and Wrong Wired Into Our Brains?'
Turn on Christian radio or TV or attend church in the Western world and you will no doubt hear pastors lamenting the decline of Christian morality in society.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.