Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
The common factor present in all living organisms, from bacteria to man, is the information contained in all their cells. It has been discovered that nowhere else can a higher statistical packing density of information be found.
Evolutionary scientists trying to get around the irreducible complexity of the genetic code keep trying to come up with simpler, more achievable alternatives to explain molecules-to-man evolution. The latest candidate for a pre-biotic “genetic code” is threose nucleic acid (TNA).
It is advantageous to consider a three-fold vertical division of types of information:
At the moment of death, the totality of DNA information is still present in all the cells, but the operational and communication information has disappeared. It is thus clear that there is another crucial difference between living beings and dead organisms.
The transfer of information is one of the fundamental principles of life.
Man’s natural language is the most comprehensive as well as the most differentiated means of expression.
The question about the origin of matter and the energies we observe in action is already answered in the first verse of the Bible.
Let us now examine how the Bible addresses the six measures for quantitatively evaluating information (especially its semantics) .
According to biblical assertions all information given out by humans is evaluated by God.
A small selection of the frequently asked questions about information theory are now listed and answered briefly.
If someone presents a model for explaining the origin of life, but he cannot say where the creative information characteristic of all life-forms came from, the crucial question remains unanswered.
There is an extreme multiplicity of life-forms around us, and even a simple unicellular organism is much more complex and purposefully designed than anything that human inventiveness can produce.
What is the reason that such a system can function?
A recent post on the Daily Telegraph accuses creationists of believing in “magic,” but it fails to see the faith needed to believe in evolution.
The cracks are beginning to show in the monopoly that evolutionist have had on academic publications.
It’s often said that ‘two heads are better than one’. But, in the case of Sam and Ella, two heads aren’t so good.
A riddle illustrating the idea of molecules-to-man evolution.
Scientists at the University of California in Berkeley have embarked on a research project to create an artificial ‘housefly’ that can fly around in dangerous or small spaces, such as collapsed buildi
How a Native American language helped win a war—and provided a subtle lesson for those who put their faith in evolution.
The most famous of all computer software gurus has recently acknowledged the brilliance of the programming in our bodies (without any hint of acknowledging the Programmer, so far).
‘Where’, questions the creationist, ‘would the information come from to effect such a transformation?
A rigorous analysis of the characteristics of information demonstrates that living things intrinsically reflect both the mind and will of their Creator.
Most would acknowledge that as complexity of information and design increases, there has to be an increase in the intelligence and ability of the one who produces it.