Creation vs. evolution is not a battle of science vs. the Bible or science vs. faith. It’s a battle between two starting points; God’s Word and man’s word. Which starting point you chose will determine how you interpret the evidence.
In the creation/evolution controversy and battle over biblical authority, much of the dispute may become clearer if writers would carefully provide readers with precise definitions of terminology. These definitions may help clear up confusion.
Why is it that evolutionists are unwilling to allow for competing models, i.e., creation or even intelligent design? The hypothesis of evolution changes every year; if one theory is said to be fact, but then a year later is shown to be wrong, then how can it be fact in the first place? A true fact is something that never changes.
Can science and religion get along? Some secular scientists do seem to be making an effort to reach out; the problem is that they are only reaching out to religious individuals who won’t let their faith “get in the way” of science.
Russell Garwood in his article “Reach out to defend evolution,” complains that creationists present “perceived gaps in scientific knowledge as evidence in support of theistic world views.” Taking a biblical stand does not undermine science; it illuminates science, just like reliable eyewitness testimony enables a detective to correctly interpret the circumstantial evidence at the scene of a crime.
Understanding the history of creationism better equips us to defend the authority of God’s Word.
For the past 200 years, Christian scholars have reinterpreted the Genesis creation account in various ways. However, there are only two overarching viewpoints among the range of interpretations.
Like a TV courtroom drama, evolutionists present their case as though it’s open and shut. But we know something is missing.
We aren’t surprised that creation is considered a minority position in a study from seven different countries regarding what they believe about evolution.
It is often claimed that it takes more faith to believe in evolution than creation.
The ten best evidences for a young earth and creation including sea floor sediment, soft tissue in fossils, carbon-14, short-lived comets, and more.
There is much debate about the nature of science and religion. Some argue the two areas give us understanding in distinct ways. But should there be a battle?
It’s hard to believe it’s already been five years since my debate with iconic TV personality and ardent atheist and evolutionist, Bill Nye, “the Science Guy.”
If creationists are unwilling to change their basic beliefs, does that mean they’re not true scientists?
One of the big dangers in sharing our faith is to get sidetracked. It helps to acknowledge areas of agreement before getting into the deeper issues.
A recent two-part piece on The BioLogos Forum admits that meshing evolution and the image of God that all humans possess is a “challenging issue.”
Being featured in a two-page spread in National Geographic is not always a compliment for Christians.
An old French essay “On Liars” contains a little gem that may help you greatly in any debate about evolution and creation.
The debate with Bill Nye really illustrated the clash of two worldviews—choosing to decide truth for ourselves instead of trusting God’s Word.
Depicting the pre-Flood world at the Ark Encounter in northern Kentucky presents a challenge for designers.
Dr. Tim LaHaye shares his perspective on the Bible teachings of the Creation and the Bible teachings of the end times.
Since 1995, Associates for Biblical Research has been digging a few miles north of Jerusalem at Khirbet el-Maqatir, the probable city of Ai.
Within the first three minutes of the Ken Ham vs. Bill Nye debate, it was obvious how radically the creation-evolution debate has changed since the 1970s and 1980s.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.