Here are fourteen natural phenomena which conflict with the evolutionary idea that the universe is billions of years old. The maximum possible ages given are always much less than the required evolutionary ages, while the biblical age (6,000 years) always fits comfortably within the maximum possible ages.
The discovery of dark matter particles (of any kind) might tell us something about the present nature of the universe, but it would not prove the big bang actually happened. From the Bible we can already know the big bang idea is wrong: the Word of God in Genesis 1 says the earth was created before the stars.
Does the universe really look old, or have we simply been indoctrinated to believe it looks old? Would the Creator God really deceive us into thinking that the universe looks old when, according to the Bible’s account, He created it only about 6,000 years ago? What would a “young universe” look like?
Scientists confidently date the earth and universe at billions of years old. Does the observational evidence support this popular assertion?
The Cassini-Huygens mission vastly improved our understanding of Saturn. The space probe Cassini’s most amazing discovery was the clear testimony to Saturn’s young age and that it had a Creator.
Two fundamental laws of physics clash if we try to explain the universe’s origin without a Creator.
God created the universe mature. Instead of giving just an appearance of age, God created it fully functional, according to the Bible.
PDF DownloadAfter 29 years of research, a creation astronomer has observable evidence that stars can’t be billions of years old.
The observations themselves merely tell us that green pea galaxies have unusual amounts of doubly ionized oxygen atoms, not an evolutionary story.
Rather than providing good evidence for the big bang model, the abundances of the light elements represents a significant problem for the standard cosmology.
One of the common objections to biblical creation is that scientists have supposedly demonstrated that the universe is much older than the Bible teaches.
Super-colliders looking for dark matter may be on a wild goose chase.
Dark matter: it’s mysterious, elusive (if it does exist), controversial—and now verified?
Though once a high-flying idea, the notion of dark energy has received another devastating blow from two mathematicians.
In the ongoing war over Texas school science standards, the age of the universe is the next battleground.
Did God create light from distant stars “in transit” to earth? Dr. Jason Lisle examines this argument from a biblical perspective.
Dark matter, a moderately evil-sounding, hypothesized component that is described as helping hold galaxies together, was all the rage just a few months ago. Now, a team of two astrophysicists is arguing that their modified theory of gravity explains the data and leaves no role for dark matter.
A reader asks how Dr. Lisle can be both an astrophysicist and a young-earth creationist.
Here are fourteen natural phenomena which conflict with the evolutionary idea that the universe is billions of years old.
The background of astronomer Edwin Hubble and his famous expanding universe law are reviewed. The significance of the Hubble constant is explained, along with the ongoing controversy regarding its actual value. Finally, a creationist view of the usefulness and limitations of the Hubble law are given.
Astronomical theory has lately run into a series of problems. The most troublesome problem is the most recent calculation of the so-called Hubble constant using the repaired Hubble Space Telescope.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.