Originally published in Creation 3, no 4 (November 1980): 10-12.
Many of our textbooks suggest that it is man’s superior intelligence which has enabled our species to modify the environment by technological innovations and so give us some control of our evolution. Increasing technological advance is seen as our salvation in the struggle to survive.
However, these texts do not suggest that our technology was achieved by accident. It is accepted as the result of applied intelligence building on the achievement of earlier generations. Animal behavior is the result of inbuilt responses to external stimuli, allied with a limited ability to learn from experience. While some animals make limited use of tools, none approaches man’s ability to design and innovate. Yet when we look at the way in which animals are suited to their environment, we find that many animals have inbuilt devices which far surpass the technological achievements of which man is so proud.
Take flight, for instance. Thoresen (1971) claims that if a small airplane were as efficient as the plover, it would fly 56 km on one liter of gasoline. Birds show excellent aerodynamic design.
No one of these features enables flight. It is only when they are put together that birds fly. Each feature could not evolve separately to its current perfection and then unite harmoniously with the other.
Flying patterns in the animal kingdom include power flying, gliding, soaring and flight like the helicopter of humming birds and dragonflies. Each has special variations for its specific mode of flight.
It is of interest to note that our planes, helicopters and gliders, designed with purpose, cannot match the design standards observed in animals following innate behavior patterns.
It is obvious that the animals did not design these devices, so how shall we explain them? Can accident produce greater design precision than intelligence? Such structures declare a Creator who knew what He was doing and planned accordingly.