1189. The Master

A Sermon Delivered By C. H. Spurgeon, At The Metropolitan Tabernacle, Newington. *2/15/2012

She called Mary her sister secretly, saying, “The Master is come, and calls for you.” [Joh 11:28]

For other sermons on this text:
   [See Spurgeon_SermonTexts "Joh 11:28"]

1. I suppose by Martha’s whispering the word “the Master” in Mary’s ear that it was the common name by which the sisters spoke of our Lord to one another in his absence. Perhaps it was his usual name among all the disciples, for Jesus said, “You call me Master and Lord: and you say well; for so I am.” It often happens that for persons whom we love we have some special title by which we speak of them familiarly when we are in the circle of those who join in our esteem of them. Instead of always using their official titles or their actual names, there is some one name which we have attached to them, which calls up happy associations, or reminds us of endearing traits in their character, and therefore it is very sweet in our mouths. So I suppose that most of the disciples called Jesus “The Master,” many of them coupling with it the word “Lord.” Mary, I should suppose, was particularly given to the use of the term, it was her name for the Lord. I imagine that she called him “my Master,” only, of course, Martha could not say to her, “your Master is come,” for that would have been to cast suspicion on her own loyalty to Jesus, and perhaps she did not feel exactly in a frame of mind to say, “our Master,” remembering that he was master of so many more besides, and half hoping that he might be Master over Death himself. She therefore said, “The Master.” It was an emphatic title, “The Master is come.” It is very remarkable that minds of a kindred spirit to Mary have always loved this title of “the Master,” and more especially that wondrous, sweet, mystic poet and dear lover of his Lord, George Herbert, who, whenever he heard the name of Jesus mentioned, would always say “my Master.” He has given us that quaint poem, called “The Odour,” which begins,

   “How sweetly doth my Master sound, my Master.”

There must needs be something exceedingly precious about the title for a Mary and a Herbert to be so enamoured by it above all others. Jesus has many names, all full of music; this must be choice indeed to be selected before them all as the title which his best beloved prefer to apply to him. There are many among us who are ourselves accustomed to speak of the Lord as the Master, and, though there are many other titles, such as “the Well Beloved,” “the Good Shepherd,” “the Friend,” “the Bridegroom,” “the Redeemer,” and “the Saviour,” yet we still cherish a very special affection for this one name, which exudes for us “an oriental fragrance,” with which “all day we do perfume our mind.”

2. You are aware that the word might just as well be translated the “Teacher,” the authoritative teacher, for that is the gist of its meaning. I am glad to pronounce it Master, because usage, and sweet association have enshrined the word, and also because we still have among us the custom of calling the Chief Teacher in a School or College the Master, but still, had our version given us “the Teacher is come” it would have been nearer the mark.

3. I. I shall speak a few words, first, upon THE DEEP PROPRIETY OF THIS TITLE AS APPLIED TO OUR LORD.

4. He is, indeed, the Master — the Teacher. What if I put the two together, and say the Master Teacher? He has a particular fitness for this office. To be a master teacher a man must have a masterly mind. Certainly all minds are not cast in the same mould, and are not possessed with the same vigour, depth, force, and quickness of action. Some mental organisations are princely by their very formation; though they may belong to plough boys, the imperial stamp is on them. These minds cannot be smothered by a peasant’s smock frock, nor kept down by the load of poverty; master minds are recognised by an innate superiority, and force their way to the front. I say nothing of the moral qualities of Napoleon, but a mind so vast as his could not have been hidden for ever away among the soldiers in the ranks; he must become a captain and a conqueror. So, too, a Cromwell or a Washington must rise to be masters among men, because the calibre of their minds was masterly. Such men see a thing quickly; they hold it with a comprehensive grasp; and they have a way of infusing faith into others about it which, before long, pushes them into a master’s position, with the common consent of all around them. You cannot have for a master teacher a man with a little soul. He may insinuate himself into the chair of the teacher, but everyone will see that he is out of place; and no one will delight to think of him as his master. There are many painters, but there have been few Raphaels, or Michael Angelos, few who could found schools to perpetuate their names. There have been many songsters, but few poets have founded schools of tuneful thought in which they have been the beloved choirmasters. There have been many philosophers, but a Socrates or an Aristotle will not be found every day; for great teachers must have great minds, and these are rare among men. The teacher of all teachers, the master of all the teachers must needs be a grand, colossal spirit, head and shoulders above other men. Such a soul Mary saw in her Lord Jesus Christ, and such we see there also, and we therefore contend for our Lord the name of “the Master.” There we have divinity itself, with its omniscience and infallibility, and at the same time a complete, full orbed manhood, harmonious in all its qualities, a perfect equilibrium of excellence, in which there is no excess and no deficiency. You find in him a perfect mind, and that mind is so human, as to be intensely manly, and sweetly womanly also. In Jesus there was all the tenderness and sympathy of woman, joined with the strength and courage of man. His love was feminine, but not effeminate; his heart was masculine, but not hard and stern. He was the complete man, unfallen manhood in its perfection.

5. Our Lord was a man who impressed all who came near him, they either hated him intensely, or loved him fervently. Wherever he was, he was seen to be a prince among the sons of men. The devil recognised him, and tempted him beyond all others. He saw in him a foe worthy of his steel, and took him into the wilderness to have a duel with him, hoping to defeat the race by vanquishing its visible chief. Even Scribes and Pharisees, who despised everyone who did not make broad the borders of his garment, could not despise this man; they could hate him, but their hate was the unconscious reverence which evil is forced to render to superlative goodness and greatness. Jesus could not be ignored and overlooked, he was a force in every place, a power wherever he might be. He is a master, yes, “the Master.” There is a grandeur about his whole human nature, so that he stands out above all other men, like some mighty Alpine peak, which overlooks the minor hills, and casts its shadow all down the vales.

6. But to make a master teacher a man must not only have a master mind, but he must have a master knowledge of what he has to teach; and it is best if that is acquired by experience rather than by instruction. Such was the case with our Lord Jesus. He came to teach us the science of life, and in him was life; he experienced life in all its phases, and was tempted in all points like we are, though without sin. The highest were not above him, he did not regard the lowest as beneath him, but he condescended to their infirmities and sorrows. There are no dreary glens of melancholy which his feet have not trodden, nor lofty peaks of joy which he has not scaled; wondrous was the joy as well as the sorrow of our Lord Jesus Christ. He leads his people through the wilderness, and, like Hobab of old, he knows where they should camp in the wilderness, and understands all the way which they must travel to reach the promised land. He was made “perfect through suffering.” He teaches us no truth as mere theory, but as matter of actual personal experience. He has tested the remedy he gives to us. If there is bitterness for us, he has quaffed full bowls of it, and if there is sweetness in his cup he gives us his joy; all things that have to do with this life and godliness, the whole science of salvation from the gates of hell up to the throne of God, he understands very well by personal acquaintance with it. There is not a single chapter of the book of revelation which he does not comprehend, nor a solitary page of the book of experience which he does not understand; and therefore he is qualified to teach, having both a master mind and a master knowledge of what he comes to inculcate.

7. Moreover, our great Master while here below had a masterly way of teaching, and this also is essential, for it is not every man of vast knowledge and great mind that can teach others. Aptness to teach is required. We know some whose utterances never seem to be in the tongue of ordinary men. If they have anything to say they say it in a jargon of their own, which they probably comprehend, and a few of their disciples, but it is Greek to commonplace people. Blessed is that teacher who teaches what he understands himself in a way which enables others to understand him. I like the style of old Cobbett when he said, “I not only speak so that men can understand me, but so that they cannot misunderstand me”; and such a teacher was Christ to his own disciples. When they sat at his feet he made truth so clear that wayfaring men, though fools, need not err in it. By homely parables and phrases which caught the ear, and won the heart, he brought down celestial truths to ordinary comprehensions, when the Spirit of God had once cleansed those comprehensions, and made them able to receive the truth. He taught, moreover, not only plainly, but lovingly. So gently did he open up things to his own disciples that it must have been a pleasure to be ignorant, in order to require to be taught, and a still greater pleasure to learn — to learn in such a way. The way in which he taught was as sweet as the truth he taught. Everyone who came into Christ’s school felt at home, felt pleased with their Master, and confident that if they could learn anywhere they must learn at his feet.

8. The Master gave, in connection with his teaching, a measure of the Holy Spirit — not the full measure, for that was reserved until he had ascended up on high, and the Spirit should baptise the church; but he gave to each of his people a measure of the Spirit of God, by which truths were not only taught to their ears but to their hearts also. Ah, my brethren, we are not such teachers as Christ; for, when we have done our best, we can only reach the ear. We cannot give the Holy Spirit, but he can; and when the Spirit comes from Christ today, and takes from his things and reveals them to us, then we see even more of our Lord’s masterly modes of teaching, and learn what a Master Jesus is, who writes his lessons, not on the blackboard, but on the fleshy tablets of the heart; who gives us schoolbooks, indeed, is himself the book; who gives us lessons, yes, is himself the lesson; who performs before us what he would have us do, so that when we know him we know what he has to teach, and when we imitate him we have followed the precepts which he gives. Our Lord’s way of embodying his instruction in himself is a very royal one, and no one can rival him in it. Do children not learn infinitely more by example than they ever do by precept? And this is how our Master teaches us. “Never a man spoke like this man” is a grand Christian proverb; but it might be eclipsed by another: “Never man acted like this man”; for this man’s deeds and words tally with each other, the deeds embody and enforce the words, give them life, and help us to understand them. He is a prophet like Moses, because he is mighty both in word and in deed, and so he is of prophets and teachers the Master.

9. Here a master mind, a master experience, and a master mode of teaching: well he is called “the Master.”

10. As well, dear friends, there was, over and above this — if I have not covered it in what I have already said — a master influence which Jesus, as a teacher, had over those who came within his range. They did not merely see, but feel; they did not only know, but love; they did not merely prize the lesson, but they worshipped the teacher. What a master was this Christ, whose very self became the power by which sin was checked, and ultimately cast out, and by which virtue was implanted, and the new life begun, nourished, and brought to perfection. To have one to teach you who is very dear to you is to make lessons easy. No child learns better than from a mother qualified to teach, who knows how to make her lessons sweet, by crystallizing them in the sugar of her own affection. Then it is pleasure, as well as duty, to learn. But no mother ever won her child’s heart (and there have been tender and affectionate mothers, too) so thoroughly as Jesus won the heart of Mary; or, I may say, as Jesus has won your heart and mine, if you feel as my heart feels for my Lord. From him we need no reasonings to prove what he says, he is himself instead of reason and of argument. His love is the logic which proves everything to us. With him we hold no debate, what he has done for us has answered every question we could raise. If he tells us what we do not understand, we believe it. We ask if we may understand it, and if he tells us “No,” we stay where we are, and believe the mystery. We love him so that we as glad not to know as to know, if such should be his will; we believe his silence to be as eloquent as his speech, and what he conceals to be as kindly intended as what he reveals. Because we love him he exercises such an influence over us that, immediately, we prize his teaching and receive it; and the more we know him, and the more his inexpressibly delightful influence dominates our nature, the more completely we yield up imagination, thought, reason, everything, to him. Men may call us fools for it, but we have learned at Jesus’ feet that “the world by wisdom did not know God,” and unless we are converted, and become as little children, we shall in no wise enter the kingdom of heaven, and therefore we are not confounded when the world thinks us childish and credulous. The world is growing more manly and more foolish, and we are growing more childlike and more wise. We think that to grow downward into our Lord Jesus is the surest and truest growth; and when we shall have grown completely down to nothing, and lower still, until we are less than nothing, then we shall be full grown in the school of Jesus, and shall take a high degree in true learning, knowing the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge.

11. We may well call him Master who has a masterly mind, a masterly experience, and a masterly way of teaching; and, moreover, wields a masterly influence over his pupils, so that they are bound heart and soul to him for ever, and consider him to be himself his own highest lesson, as well as the chief of all instructors.

12. Having proved that our beloved Lord is fairly entitled to the name, let me add that he is by office the sole and only Master of the church.

13. There is in the Christian church no authority for a doctrine but Christ’s word. The inspired book which he has left us, charging us never to diminish a letter or add a syllable, that is our imperial code, our authorized creed, and our settled standard of belief. I hear a great deal said of various “Bodies of divinity,” but my own impression is that there only was one body of divinity, and there always will be only one, and that is Jesus Christ in whom “dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.” For the true church her body of divinity is Christ. Some churches refer to other standards, but we know no standard of theology except our Master. “I, if I am lifted up,” he says, “will draw all men to me”; we feel no drawings towards any other master. He is the standard, — “To him shall the gathering of the people be.” We are not of those who will go no further than Martin Luther. Blessed be God for Martin Luther! May God forbid that we should say a word in depreciation of him. But were we baptized in the name of Martin Luther? I do not think so. Some can never budge an inch beyond John Calvin, whom I reverence first of all merely mortal men; but still John Calvin is not our master, but only a more advanced pupil in the school of Christ. He teaches, and, as far as he teaches as Christ taught, he is authoritative, but where Calvin goes apart from Jesus he is no more to be followed than Voltaire himself. There are brethren whose one reference for everything is to the utterances of John Wesley. “What would Mr. Wesley have said?” is a weighty question with them. We think it a little matter what he would have said, or what he did say for the guidance of Christians, now so many years after his departure; it is far better to enquire what Jesus says in his word. One of the grandest of men who ever lived was Wesley, but he is no master of ours. We were not baptized in the name of John Wesley, or John Calvin, or Martin Luther. “One is our Master, even Christ.” And now the parliament of our country is about to set apart a learned judge to decide what is right in a so called church of Christ, and he is to say, “This garment you may wear, and that you shall not; your ritual shall go so far but no further.” In his person the House of Commons is to be recognised as the creator and lord and master of the Church of England, to whom he will say, “Do this,” and she will do it, or “Refrain,” and she will restrain her hand. She must crouch and bend, and take her food like any dog from the hand that patronizes her, and her collar, made of what brass or leather Caesar chooses to ordain, shall bear this motto, “His servants you are whom you obey.” Why, the poorest minister in the most despised of our churches, whose poverty is thought to make him contemptible, but whose poverty is his glory if he bears it for Christ’s sake, would scorn to have any spiritual act of his church submitted to the judgment of the state, and would sooner die than be dictated to in the matter of divine worship. What has the church to do with the state? Our Master and Lord has set up a kingdom which acknowledges no other King except himself; and we cannot bow, and will not bow, before decrees of Parliament and lords and kings in spiritual things. Christ’s church has only one head, and that is Christ, and the doctrines which the church has to teach cannot be tested by a Court of Arches, [a] or a bench of bishops, or a synod of ministers or a presbytery, or a conference. The Lord Jesus Christ has taught us this and that: if his teaching is contradicted, the contradiction is treason against his crown. Though the whole church were assembled, and that church the true one, if it should contradict the teaching of Christ, its decrees ought to be no more to a Christian than the whistling of the wind upon the mountain wilds, for Christ is Master, and no one but Christ. Though an apostle or an angel from heaven preaches any other doctrine than that of our Lord, let him be accursed I wish that all Christians stood up for this. Then would

   Sects and names and parties fall,
   And Jesus Christ be all in all.

He is the sole teacher and the sole legislator. A church has a right to execute Christ’s laws, but she has no right to make a law. The ministers of Christ are bound to carry out the rules of Christ, and when they do so, what is bound on earth is bound in heaven; but if they have acted upon any rules except those of this book their laws are only worthy of contempt; no matter what they are, they bind no Christian heart. It shall be our joy to wear the yoke Christ puts on us, but it shall be our glory to trample on the yoke which prelates would thrust upon us. “If the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.” “Stand firm therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made you free, and do not be entangled again with the yoke of bondage.”

14. “The Master.” That is the name Christ should receive throughout the whole church, and he should be regarded always, and on all occasions, and in reference to all spiritual subjects, as the last Court of Appeal, whose inspired word is

   The judge that ends the strife
   Where wit and reason fail.

15. So much upon the propriety of the title.

16. II. But now, secondly, let us consider THE PARTICULAR RECOGNITION WHICH MARY GAVE TO CHRIST AS THE MASTER.

17. How did she give that recognition? She became his pupil: she sat very reverently at his feet. Beloved, if he is our Master, let us do the same. Let us take every word of Jesus, weigh it, read it, mark it, learn it, feed on it and inwardly digest it. I am afraid we do not read our Bibles as we should, or attach such importance as we ought to every shade of expression which our Master uses. I should like to see a picture of Mary sitting at the Master’s feet. Great artists have painted the Virgin Mary so often that they might take a change, and sketch this Mary looking up with a deep, fixed gaze, drinking all in, and treasuring all up; sometimes startled by a new thought and a fresh doctrine, and then enquiringly waiting until her face beams with unspeakable delight as new light floods her heart. Her attentive discipleship proved how truly Jesus was her Master.

18. Then, notice, she was not only his disciple, but she was a disciple of no one else. I do not know whether Gamaliel was in fashion then, but she did not sit at his feet. I dare say there was some Rabbi Ben Simon, or other famous doctor of the period, but Mary never spent an hour with him, for every moment she could set apart was joyously spent at the feet of a far dearer Rabbi. I wonder whether she was a little deaf, and so sat close to the teacher for fear of losing a word! Perhaps she feared she might be slow of heart, and so she got as near the preacher as others do who have a little deafness in their ears; anyway her favourite place was close at his feet. That shows us, since we are always dull of hearing in our souls, that it is good to get very close to Jesus when we are hearing him, and commune while we listen. She did not change from him to someone else for variety’s sake. No, the Master, her Master, her only Master, was the Nazarene, whom others despised, but whom she called her Lord.

19. She was a willing scholar, for “Mary has chosen the good part,” said Jesus. No one sent her to sit at Jesus’ feet. Jesus drew her, and she could not help coming, but she loved to be there. She was a willing and delighted listener. She was never so happy as when she had her choice, that choice being always to learn from him. Children at school always learn well if they want to learn. If they are driven to school they learn very little comparatively, but when they want to go, and when they love the teacher, it is quick learning with them; and happy is the teacher who has a class that has chosen him to teach them. Mary could well call him “the Master,” for she rendered him her sole attention, her loving and delighted attention.

20. And, notice, in choosing Christ for her Master, she perseveringly stuck to him. Her choice was not taken away from her, and she did not give it up. Martha looked very cross one day. How was she to attend to the roast meat and the boiled soup at once? How could she be expected to prepare the table, and to look to the fire in the kitchen too? Why could Mary not come? And she scowled, I do not doubt. But it did not matter. Mary still sat there. Perhaps she did not even notice Martha’s face; I think she did not, for the saints do not notice other countenances when Christ’s beauty is to be seen: there is something so absorbing about him; he takes you all into himself, and bears you right away, drawing not only all men, but all of men to himself, when he does draw; and so she still sat there, and listened on. Those children will learn who stick to their books, who come not sometimes to study, but are always learning. So Mary recognised the Lord Jesus Christ’s master teachership by giving to him that persevering attention which such a Master Teacher had a right to claim.

21. She went humbly to him; for while she sat at his feet for nearness, she sat there, too, out of deep humiliation of spirit. She felt it her highest honour to be sitting in the lowest place, for her mind was lowly. They shall learn the most about Christ who think the least about themselves. When a place at his feet seems to be too good for us, or at any rate we are more than content with it, then his speech will distil as the rain and drop as the dew, and we shall be as the tender herbs that drink in sweet refreshment, and our souls shall grow.

22. Blessed were you, oh Mary! And blessed is each one of you, if you can call Christ your Master and prove it as she did. You shall have the good part which shall not be taken away from you.

23. III. Now I come to my third point, which is this — THE SPECIAL SWEETNESS OF THE NAME TO US. I have shown why it was particularly recognised by Mary, and now I would show that it has a particular sweetness for us also. “The Master” or “My Master,” or “My Teacher.”

24. I love that name in my own soul, because it is as a teacher that Jesus Christ is my Saviour. The best illustration I can give you is that of one of those poor little boys in the street, a street urchin, without father and mother, or with parents worse than none; the poor child is covered with filth and rags, he is well known to the policemen, and has seen the inside of many a jail; but a teacher of a Ragged School [b] has laid hold of him, and instructs him, and he is now washed and clothed, and happy. Now, that poor boy does not know the sweetness of “my father” or “my mother”; he does not recognise anything in those titles. Perhaps he never knew them, or only knew such a form of them as to disgust him. But with what a zest does he say, “My teacher!” These little children say, “My teacher” with quite as much affection as others speak of their mother. Where there has been a great moral change accomplished by the influence of a teacher, the name “my teacher” has great sweetness in it. Now hear the parable of the ragged boy and his teacher! I was that ragged child. Truly, I did not think myself ragged, for I was foolish enough to think my rags were fine garments, and that my filth was my beauty. I did not know what I was. My teacher saw me, he knew how foul I was and how ragged I was, and he taught me to see myself, and also to believe that he could wash me whiter than the snow. Yes, he went further and actually washed me until I was clean before the Lord. My teacher showed me a wardrobe of snow-white linen garments, and clothed me in them. My teacher has taught me a thousand things, and bestowed innumerable good works upon me; I owe my salvation wholly to my teacher, my master, my Lord. Can you not say the same? I know you can if you are indeed disciples of Jesus. “My teacher” means to you “my Saviour,” for he saved you by teaching you your disease and your remedy, teaching you how wrong you were, and making you right by his teaching. The word “master” or “teacher” has to us a delightful meaning, for it is by his teaching that we are saved.

25. Let me tell you how as a preacher I love that name “my Master.” I like to feel that what I said to those people on Sunday was not mine. I preached my Master, and I preached what my Master told me to. Some find fault with the doctrine; I do not care because it was not mine, it was my Master’s. If I were a servant, and went to the front door with a message, and the gentleman to whom I took it did not like the message, I should say, “Do not be vexed with me, sir. I have told you my master’s message to the best of my ability, and I am not responsible for it. It is my master’s word, not mine.” When there are no souls converted it is dreary work, and one’s heart is heavy, but it is sweet to go and tell your Master; and when souls are converted, and your heart is glad, it is a happy and a healthy thing to give all the glory to your Master. It must be an awkward thing to be an ambassador from the English court in some far off land where there is no telegraph, and where the ambassador has to act on his own responsibility. He must feel it to be a serious burden. But, blessed be God, between every true minister and his Master there is a telegraphic communication; he need never do anything on his own account. He may imitate the disciples of John, who, when they had taken up John the Baptist’s mangled body, went and told Jesus. That is the thing to do. There are difficulties in all churches, troubles in all families, and cares in all businesses, but it is good to have a Master to whom you can go as a servant, feeling, “He has the responsibility of the whole concern — not I; I have only to do what he bids me.” If we once step beyond our Lord’s commands the responsibility rests on us, and our trouble begins, but if we follow our Lord we cannot go astray.

26. And is this not a sweet name to quote when you are troubled, dear friends? Perhaps some of you are in trouble now. How it removes fear when you find out that he who sent the trouble is the Teacher who teaches you by the trouble — the Master who has a right to use what form of teaching he likes. In our schools much is learned from the blackboard, and in Christ’s school much is learned from affliction. You have heard the story often, but I venture to repeat it again, of the gardener who had preserved with great care a very choice rose; and one morning when he went into the garden it was gone, and he scolded his fellow servants, and felt very grieved, until someone said, “I saw the master coming through the garden this morning, and I believe he took the rose.” “Oh, then,” said he, “if the master took it, I am content.” Have you lost a dear child, or a wife, or a friend? It was he who took your flower. It belonged to him. Would you wish to keep what Jesus wants? We are asked to pray sometimes for the lives of good people, and I think we may, but I have not always exercised faith while pleading, because it seemed to me that Christ pulled one way and I pulled the other. I said, “Father, let them be here,” and Jesus said, “Father, I will that they be with me where I am”; and one could not pull very hard then. Only feel that Christ is drawing the other way, and you give up directly. You say, “Let the Master have it. The servant cannot oppose the Master.” It is the Lord; let him do what seems good to him. I was dumb with silence; I did not open my mouth because you did it. Our Master learned that lesson himself which he teaches to us. That is a very striking expression, “Father, I thank you that you have hidden these things from the wise and prudent, and have revealed them to babes; even so Father, for so it seemed good in your sight.” It pleased God to pass by the wise and prudent, and therefore it pleased Christ that it should be so. It is well to have our hearts like that poor shepherd to whom a gentleman said, “I wish you a good day.” He said, “I never knew a bad day.” “How is that, my friend?” “The days are such as God chooses to make them, and therefore they are all good.” “Well,” said the other, “but some days please you more than others?” “No,” he said, “what pleases God pleases me.” “Well, but do you not have a choice?” said the other. “Yes, I have a choice, and that is, I choose that God should choose for me.” “But do you not have a choice whether you would live or die?” “No,” he said, “for if I am here Christ will be with me, and if I am in heaven I shall be with him.” “But suppose you had to choose?” “I would ask God to choose for me,” he said. Oh, sweet simplicity which leaves everything with God; this is calling Jesus, Master, to perfection:

   Pleased with all the Lord provides,
   Weaned from all the world besides.

27. Once again, dear friends, is it not sweet for us to call Jesus Master, because in so doing we take a position easy to reach, and yet most delightful. To call him bridegroom — what an honour it is to be so nearly related to the Son of God! Friend is a familiar and honourable title; to call him Master, however, is often easier, and it is quite as sweet, for his service, if we take no higher place, is pure delight for us. If our hearts are right, to do the Lord’s bidding is as much as we can ask for. Though we are sons now and not slaves, and therefore our service is of a different character from what it ever has been before, yet service is delight. What will heaven be except perpetual service? Here we labour to enter into rest; there they enter into rest while they labour. Their rest is the perfect obedience of their fully sanctified spirits. Are you not panting for it? Will it not be one of your greatest joys in heaven to feel that you are his servants? The glorified ones are called his servants in heaven. “His servants shall serve him, and they shall see his face, and his name shall be in their foreheads.” Rid us of sin, and we should be in heaven now; earth would be heaven for us.

28. I want you, dear brethren in Christ, to go away rolling this sweet word under your tongue — “My Master,” “My Master.” You will never hear better music than that — “My Master,” “My Master.” Go and live as servants should live. Take care that you truly make him your Master, for he says, “If I am a Master where is my honour?” Speak well of him, for servants should speak well of a good Master, and no servant ever had so dear a Master as he is.

29. But there are some of you who cannot say this. I wish you could. Jesus is not your Master. Who is, then? You have a master somewhere, for “his servants you are whom you obey.” Now, if you obey the lusts of the flesh, your master is your flesh, and the wages will be corruption; for that is what flesh comes to, corruption, and nothing better. Or your master is the devil, and his wages must be death. Run away from such a master. Mostly when servants leave their masters they are bound to give notice, but here is a case in which no notice should ever be given. When the prodigal son ran away from feeding the swine he never stopped to give notice that he was going to leave the pigs, but started off directly, and I recommend every sinner to run by the grace of God straight away from his sins. Stopping to give notice is the ruin of many. They intend to be sober, but they must treat their good resolution to another glass or two; they intend to think about divine things, but they must go to the theatre once more; they would gladly serve Christ, but tomorrow, not tonight. If I had such a master as you have — you who live in sin — I would be up and away at once, by the grace of God, and say, “I will have Christ for my Lord.” Look at your black master. Look at his cunning eyes! Can you not see that he is a flatterer? He intends your ruin. He will destroy you as he has destroyed myriads already. That horrid leer of sin, that painted face, consider them and abhor them. Do not serve a master who, though he gives you fair promises, labours for your destruction! Up and away, you slaves of sin! Eternal Spirit, come and break their chains! Sweet star of liberty, guide them to the free country, and let them find in Jesus Christ their liberty! My Master rejoices to receive runaways. His door is open to vagrants and vagabonds, to the scum of the earth, and the offscouring of all things, to men who are dissatisfied with themselves, to wretches who have no joy in their lives, and are ready to lie down and die. “This man receives sinners.” He is like David, who went into Adullam, and every man who was in debt and discontented came to him, and he became a captain over them. As Romulus and Remus gathered the first population of new Rome by harbouring escaped slaves and robbers, whom they trained into citizens and made to be brave soldiers, so my Master has laid the foundation of the new Jerusalem, and he looks for his citizens — indeed, the noblest of them, over there, where sin and Satan hold them captive; and he asks us to sound out the silver trumpet, and tell the slaves of sin that if they flee to him he will never give them up to their old master, but he will emancipate them, make them citizens of his great city, sharers of his bounties, partakers in his triumphs; and they shall be his in the day when he makes up his jewels. I remember preaching in this strain once, and an old sea captain told me after the sermon that he had served under the black flag for fifty years, and by the grace of God he would tear the old rag down, and run up the blood red cross at the masthead. I recommended him not merely to change his flag, but to see that the vessel was repaired, but he wisely replied that repairing would be of no use to such an old waterlogged hulk, and he had better scuttle the old ship, and have a new one. I think that is the best thing to do, to be dead indeed to sin, and made alive in Christ Jesus; for you may do whatever you wish with the old wreck of fallen nature, you will never keep it afloat. The old man must be crucified with Christ, it must be dead, and buried, and sunk fifty thousand fathoms deep, never to be heard of again. In the new vessel which Jesus launches in the day of our regeneration, with the blessed flag of atoning blood above us, we will sail to heaven convoyed by irresistible grace, giving God the glory for ever and ever. Amen.

[Portion Of Scripture Read Before Sermon — Joh 11]
[See Spurgeon_Hymnal “The Christian, Privileges, Communion with Jesus — ‘Who Loved Me, And Gave Himself For Me’ ” 797]
[See Spurgeon_Hymnal “The Christian, Privileges, Communion with Jesus — Emptied Of Earth” 769]
[See Spurgeon_Hymnal “The Christian, Privileges, Communion with Jesus — None But Jesus” 768]

[a] Court of Arches: The Court of Arches is the provincial court for Canterbury. It has both appellate and original jurisdiction. It is presided over by the Dean of the Arches, who is styled The Right Honourable and Right Worshipful the Official Principal and Dean of the Arches. The dean must be a barrister of ten years’ High Court standing or the holder or former holder of high judicial office. The appointment is made by the two archbishops jointly. See Explorer "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arches_Court"
[b] Ragged School: A free school for children of the poorest class. OED.

The Christian, Privileges, Communion with Jesus
797 — “Who Loved Me, And Gave Himself For Me” <8.8.6.>
1 Oh Love divine, how sweet thou art!
   When shall I find my willing heart
      All taken up by thee?
   I thirst, I faint, I die to prove
   The greatness of redeeming love,
      The love of Christ to me!
2 Stronger his love than death or hell;
   Its riches are unsearchable:
      The first-born sons of light
   Desire in vain its depths to see;
   They cannot reach the mystery,
      The length, and breadth, and height.
3 God only knows the love of God:
   Oh that it now were shed abroad
      In this poor stony heart;
   For love I sigh, for love I pine:
   This only portion, Lord, be mine,
      Be mine this better part.
4 Oh that I could for ever sit
   With Mary at the Master’s feet;
      Be this my happy choice:
   My only care, delight, and bliss,
   My joy, my heaven on earth, be this,
      To hear the Bridegroom’s voice.
                        Charles Wesley, 1746.

The Christian, Privileges, Communion with Jesus
769 — Emptied Of Earth
1 Emptied of earth I fain would be,
   Of sin, myself, and all but thee;
   Only reserved for Christ that died,
   Surrender’d to the Crucified:
2 Sequester’d from the noise and strife,
   The lust, the pomp, and pride of life;
   For heaven alone my heart prepare,
   And have my conversation there.
3 Nothing, save Jesus, would I know;
   My friend and my companion thou!
   Lord, seize my heart, assert thy right,
   And put all other loves to flight.
4 The idols tread beneath thy feet,
   And to thyself the conquest get:
   Let sin no more oppose my Lord,
   Slain by the Spirit’s two-edged sword.
5 Larger communion let me prove
   With thee, blest object of my love;
   But oh! for this no power have I;
   My strength is at thy feet to lie.
               Augustus M. Toplady, 1759.

The Christian, Privileges, Communion with Jesus
768 — None But Jesus
1 Oh might this worthless heart of mine,
      The Saviour’s temple be!
   Emptied of every love but thine,
      And shut to all but thee!
2 I long to find thy presence there,
      I long to see thy face;
   Almighty Lord, my heart prepare
      The Saviour to embrace.
               Augustus M. Toplady, 1759.