Brandon Ambrosino's article about AiG undermines his own position—and illustrates how hostile media often help the very activities they’re trying to oppose.
There is a wide range of VBS music out there. Some may be just for fun, but some illustrate components of the Bible or help reiterate memory verses.
Kenneth Keathley distinguishes our view from universal common ancestry, but putting “Ken Ham Embraces Evolution” as the title of his post is highly misleading.
In the cover article you’ll see some surprising facts that will help you find common ground when talking to an evolutionist.
When men are convinced against their wills, when the heart struggles against the head, it usually happens that they turn persecutors.
Many international and national newspapers have been printing lengthy articles about the Ark Encounter’s construction progress.
We cannot draw near to the Most High except along the blood-sprinkled way of sacrifice. Our way to God lies only through the sacrifice of his Son.
Don’t you like hearing good news for a change about religious freedom?
The Wild Brothers: Tiger Trails documents the Wild brothers’ attempts to uncover the identity of a mysterious and very elusive jungle predator.
The best place to see, test, and put together all these ideas about stacks of fossil-bearing rock is the Grand Canyon.
Can science help us decide how fast fossils form, and how fast those sedimentary rock layers pile up?
When it comes to fossils, creation has passed the scientific test with flying colors.
Despite phenomenal fossil failure, faith in evolution remains unbounded.
Despite phenomenal fossil failure, faith in evolution remains unbounded.
Did you ever wonder what kind of plants the dinosaurs tromped around on? The answer may surprise you.
Trilobites are very famous as fossils and may have a lot to tell us about how life began.
According to evolution, the boundaries between kinds should blur as we look further and further back into their fossil history.
Can changes from molecules-to-man (macroevolution) be explained by (extrapolated from) the process of mutation-selection (microevolution)?
Mutations are no real help in explaining the origin of species, but they are great for explaining the origin of disease, disease organisms, and birth defects.
If evolutionists really spoke and wrote only about observable variation within kind, there would be no creation-evolution controversy.
Could there be enough variation in two created human beings to produce all the variation among human beings we see today?