Nobody has provided us with answers that point to anything but a traditional view of the original meaning. Anyone who says that a closer study of the Hebrew leads elsewhere is simply incorrect. The original intent is plain—a day was a day, from the very first miraculous day.
If God created the world over millions of years, there would have been death before the Fall—hardly the definition of a “very good” creation. If the days of creation are really geologic ages of millions of years, then the gospel message is undermined at its foundation because it puts death, disease, thorns, and suffering before the Fall.
All of the activities described for each of the days of the Creation Week could easily have been accomplished within 12 hours of the respective days. It is only when one adds timing elements to the text that the sixth day seems to describe too many events.
Many old-earth proponents in the church today try to use the Christian theologian Augustine (AD 354–430) as a support for their belief in millions of years. But there is plenty of evidence that Augustine wasn’t an old-earther. Rather, he believed that God created everything in an instant.
We seem to know what the word “day” means everywhere else in the Old Testament, but not in Genesis 1. Why is there a problem with Genesis 1?
Some questions don’t ever seem to get resolved. What about the age-old question: "What came first, the chicken or the egg"?
God’s commentary on the Sabbath refutes all long-age theories.
Did God make Adam from dust? The answer is obvious, isn’t it?
How can we be sure the days of creation were six literal 24-hour days?
For more than 200 years, Christians have been trying to reinterpret the six days of Creation in Genesis 1 to make them align with millions of years.
The plain meaning of Genesis, how the "days" in Genesis 1 have been understood in church history & answering common objections to the historical reading of Genesis
A biblical overview for why our week is only seven days, how the secular world explains it, and the benefits we enjoy from God’s ordained work-rest weekly pattern
Old-earthers claim Augustine as support for figurative interpretations of Genesis 1. But what did Augustine really say?
The top Hebrew scholars all agree that the writer of Genesis 1 intended the word “day” to mean 24 hours. If they all agree . . . then why can’t we?
Unlike the other five days of creation week, God does not look over what he has made on day two and declare that it was “good.”
God created plants on Day Three of Creation Week, the day before he created the sun. How could this be, and what does this imply about the age of the earth?
Is the evidence for evolution so overwhelming that teachers may be justified in running over the religious beliefs of many students and their parents?
The words in the space of six days came from John Calvin’s comments on Genesis. But was Calvin unclear about the length of the days of creation?
The Apostle Peter understood Genesis to refer to a supernatural creation and global Flood which he used to counter the arguments of the scoffers in his time.
Is it really necessary for AiG to be so adamant about the six days?
“Why make such a big deal about the age of the earth? It’s so divisive!”
Many Christians reject the straightforward, historical reading of the Genesis creation account simply because they believe it cannot be verified by science.
Dr. Danny Faulkner answers questions about the light created on Day One and celestial objects on Day Four. Does belief in God violate operational science?
In this week’s feedback article Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S. responds to someone who dared us to publish his comments about too many events allegedly happening on Day Six.
Learn why we should support a traditional, plain-language reading of Genesis 1 and 2.
PDF DownloadAnswers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.