Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
Shedding any pretense of impartiality, the New York Times admits a strong bias against the “marginal” creationist view, which “we don’t treat . . . as science.”
Time magazine featured New York Times’ executive editor Bill Keller answering a battery of questions, including: “Should journalists strive to present ideas as balanced, regardless of the actual credibility of either side?”
In his answer, notice what view Keller lumped into the category of non-credible ideas: “I don’t think fairness means that you give equal time to every point of view no matter how marginal. You weigh the sides, you do some truth-testing, you apply judgment to them. We don’t treat creationism as science . . . .”*
This admission confirms that the New York Times, the “newspaper of record,” has a strong editorial bias against creationists. His comments ignore the many scientists worldwide who are creationists and hold PhD degrees from respected schools. They are hardly “marginal.”
*Time, July 20, 2009.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively. We focus on providing answers to questions about the Bible—particularly the book of Genesis—regarding key issues such as creation, evolution, science, and the age of the earth.