Carpenter ant colonies evade zombie apocalypse because only the climbing dead become weapons of mass dispersion.
Scientists cannot only write about amazing fossil discoveries; now, they can write with one!
Astronomers have once again discovered a “building block” of life in outer space.
“This model should cause everyone to re-evaluate what they’ve said before”—the words of a Duke University professor whose research turns the origins of bipedal walking on its head.
The fuss over martian methane—which had fueled hopes for life on the Red Planet—may be misplaced, according to a new study.
For the first time, astronomers have detected a planet that could be said to “swim against the flow”—orbiting in the opposite direction from the spin of its star.
Two Christian evolutionists send a broadside our way with a USA Today opinion piece this week. But do they bring up anything new?
Another study reminds us that the idea of “vestigial organs” is, itself, vestigial!
In one of the strangest news stories we’ve examined to date, an Oxford biologist declares that Genesis is incredibly accurate; then says “creationism is totally unfounded”; then admits “the first page of the Bible . . . doesn’t spell out any of the science in detail.”
They’re the incredibly intelligent, tool-wielding animals we’ve covered frequently in the past. No, not chimps; we’re talking about crows once again.
“Mammals are special,” declares the leader of a new study on animal success rates. Just what does he mean?
If the idea behind item #1 (above) is correct, perhaps the domestic dog would be the biggest “winner” of all.
What were pterosaurs really like? An uncertain topic grows all the more perplexing after a new look at an old fossil.
Chimpanzees have proven to be quite skillful at learning certain basic tasks—particularly those related to obtaining food—but even evolutionists have to admit that “technological innovation and improvement seem to be uniquely human traits.”
Fossil specimens discovered in Russia 15 years ago have finally landed in the news—for reasons including the fact that they were millions of years “ahead of schedule.”
The brilliantly colored bills of toucans aren’t just eye candy. Rather, they play an essential role in helping the birds control their temperature, scientists report.
Love us or hate us, the Answers in Genesis Creation Museum continues to attract media attention, popular fascination, and widespread misperception.
The first animals didn’t evolve in the ocean, claims a controversial new study. Instead, the study suggests the earliest animals called a saltwater lake home.
It’s a sad case of violence in Iraq: evidence of human-on-human violence from more than 50,000 years ago (allegedly).
Small biological changes that take generations—like some birds’ beaks growing longer or shorter in certain ecological niches—can be explained and understood by creationists and evolutionists. But when it comes to explaining developmental “leaps,” evolutionists must make a leap of logic.
Hot news about chimps, “missing links,” and evolution—but the story has nothing to do with human origins or anthropology. What could it be?
It’s the “Grand Canyon of Durham” in England: a miniature canyon carved into a barley field by “torrential rain” over a weekend.
What do Americans think of science? What do they think of scientists? What do scientists think of science? A Pew Research Center study suggests answers.
Evolutionists take another stab at answering what Charles Darwin called an “abominable mystery”: the abrupt appearance and ubiquity of flowering plants in the fossil record and on earth.
The New York Times–News to Note conversation continues.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.