Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
This is the headline of a new story in the media. How many times do we read headlines declaring some supposed finding that “proves” evolution such as another “ape-man” find—or that they supposedly found evidence of life on mars (remember the mars rock episode)—only to read an article days, months, or years later stating the item is no longer accepted.
If secularists would only admit the difference between historical science and observational science, then the way they write up their findings would be very different. However, that would mean they would have to admit a belief aspect in regards to their position on origins. The secular media all too often hypes any findings that seem to support evolution (whether biological, astronomical, anthropological, or geological) because man’s sinful heart does not want to seek God.
“There is none who understands; There is none who seeks after God” (Romans 3:11).
Here is a link to the news story.