Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
On a particular blog post in the past, I commented that many of the so called “science” bloggers (such as PZ Myers from the University of Minnesota, Morris) are mostly expressing their anti-Christian rhetoric, engaging in name calling, and using vile and blasphemous language in attempt to shock their audiences. They are intolerant of just about everyone except themselves, and arrogantly mock those who don’t agree with their atheistic religious beliefs.
It was fascinating yesterday to read a commentary from the New York Times of all places, making these statements about these same “science” bloggers:
. . . but does everyone take for granted now that science sites are where graduate students, researchers, doctors and the “skeptical community” go not to interpret data or review experiments but to chip off one-liners, promote their books and jeer at smokers, fat people and churchgoers? And can anyone who still enjoys this class-inflected bloodsport tell me why it has to happen under the banner of science?It’s good to see that there are those in the secular world who are prepared to expose what these bloggers really are attempting to do in their so-called “science” blogs!
Hammering away at an ideology, substituting stridency for contemplation, pummeling its enemies in absentia: ScienceBlogs has become Fox News for the religion-baiting, peak-oil crowd. Though Myers and other science bloggers boast that they can be jerky in the service of anti-charlatanism, that’s not what’s bothersome about them. What’s bothersome is that the site is misleading. It’s not science by scientists, not even remotely; it’s science blogging by science bloggers. And science blogging, apparently, is a form of redundant and effortfully incendiary rhetoric that draws bad-faith moral authority from the word “science” and from occasional invocations of “peer-reviewed” thises and thats.
Under cover of intellectual rigor, the science bloggers — or many of the most visible ones, anyway — prosecute agendas so charged with bigotry that it doesn’t take a pun-happy French critic or a rapier-witted Cambridge atheist to call this whole ScienceBlogs enterprise what it is, or has become: class-war claptrap.
You can read the entire New York Times piece on their website.
Here are some photographs from the evening:
Praise the Lord for the openings we receive at AiG to spread the creation/gospel message throughout this and other nations.
Humble you, and to prove you, to know what was in your heartThanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
(Deuteronomy 8:2) And thou shall remember all the way which the LORD thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee, and to prove thee, to know what was in your heart, whether you would keep his commandments, or not.
The Lord Jesus Christ wants us to know what is in our hearts & how our hearts can be strengthened to have Him as our only God with no rivals; so, He tries us.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ effectively. We focus on providing answers to questions about the Bible—particularly the book of Genesis—regarding key issues such as creation, evolution, science, and the age of the earth.