There are certain people that can take a limited number of facts in the present and come to very accurate conclusions regarding what will likely occur in the future. Some may call them prophetic, not in the sense that God has revealed future events to them supernaturally, but because they simply use their God-given cognitive gifts in a unique way.
Often dismissed as “alarmists” and “fearmongers,” these people are often the ones people reflect about later as the “ones we should have listened to.” One such person in the church was the famous theologian Francis Schaeffer. Another is Ken Ham, founder of Answers in Genesis. What was/is the difference between them?
Schaeffer often predicted where he saw society inevitably arriving because he could draw a clear line in his mind from the abandonment of concepts, like belief in absolutes (derived from Scripture), to what that would look like as a logical outworking in the minds of the average persons.
For example, long before the West was even mildly comfortable with the idea of anything but heterosexual unions, in his book The God Who Is There (published in 1968), he wrote,
It is imperative that Christians realize the conclusions which are being drawn as a result of the death of absolutes.1
From his observations in culture regarding the increasing denial of the idea that any absolute conclusions could be made, he was then able to say,
[M]odern homosexuality is an expression of the current denial of antithesis. It has led in this case to an obliteration of the distinction between man and woman. So the male and the female as complementary partners are finished.2
And of course, he was right, just look at the society we live in today, where many even in the church do not condemn, and even show support for, sex before marriage, homosexual “marriage,” non-traditional gender status, etc. And Schaeffer often lamented what he deemed liberal outlooks in the evangelical church. In his 1970 book, The Church at the End of the Twentieth Century, he noted a problem “for those who did not leave the liberally controlled denominations is their natural tendency constantly to move back the line at which the final stand must be taken.”3
Similarly, in 1987, Ken Ham’s book, The Lie: Evolution, was published, and the words within it were also prophetic. Ken warned the church about the destructive effects of compromise with evolutionary/millions of years ideas. He warned that compromise in Genesis would undermine scriptural authority in the culture and erode confidence in the infallibility of God’s Word. And he also was correct.
Today, Christians themselves increasingly doubt the Bible’s reliability, and the compromising of Genesis has led to a generational loss of an acceptance of the absolute authority of the Word of God and to an exodus of young people from the church. Christians are not only confused when it comes to Genesis and the age of the earth but now they often even doubt the reality of hell, Adam as a real person, Christ’s own words about creation, belief in Jesus as the only way to heaven and much more. One compromise just leads to another—and it has to end if we want to leave a legacy of faith to future generations.
Both of these men pointed out the looming precipice too many church leaders are rushing towards: a denial of the full authority and accuracy of the Bible. Unfortunately, despite his warning that Christians were not holding the line on biblical authority, Schaeffer himself had already stepped over that “final line” because he had come to believe in the concept of “millions of years” of earth history, something he did not come to believe in because of the plain reading of Scripture.
You see the difference between Francis and Ken is the willingness to stand firmly on the Word of God in all areas. Millions of years is the line where the “final stand” must be taken. Once Christians mistakenly conceded that the Bible doesn’t have to mean what it says in regards to the age of the earth, accepted concepts like “death before sin” (the logical outworking of adding deep time to the Bible), and went so far as to say that what Jesus himself believed about creation was incorrect, biblical authority had been abandoned!
Of course, we must not seem too uncharitable to a brother in the Lord, as we know we all have feet of clay and planks in our own eyes that we must deal with. But it is loving to call out our brethren in love back to the authority of God’s Word. Even Paul called out other Christians’ sin in Galatians 2:14: “But when I saw that their conduct was not in step with the truth of the gospel, I said to Cephas before them all, ‘If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?’”
And indeed, Scripture encourages us to contend for the faith:
Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. (Jude 1:3)
So I encourage you who are perhaps struggling with these issues, dig in to God’s Word and the many resources on the www.AnswersinGenesis.ca so that you can stand boldly on the authority of God’s Word. And love those around you enough to confront them with the message that they can indeed trust the Word of God from the very first verse. As Ken put it,
I call on Christians everywhere to shut the door to this compromise that is undermining the church and culture. Indeed, we are seeing the collapse of biblical Christianity in the West as scriptural authority is questioned.
The idea of millions of years is like a disease in the church; biological evolution is just a symptom. Your support of AiG, with God’s blessing, will help prevent the disease from spreading further.4
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.