Carpenter ant colonies evade zombie apocalypse because only the climbing dead become weapons of mass dispersion.
Love us or hate us, the Answers in Genesis Creation Museum continues to attract media attention, popular fascination, and widespread misperception.
The first animals didn’t evolve in the ocean, claims a controversial new study. Instead, the study suggests the earliest animals called a saltwater lake home.
Chimpanzees have proven to be quite skillful at learning certain basic tasks—particularly those related to obtaining food—but even evolutionists have to admit that “technological innovation and improvement seem to be uniquely human traits.”
Hot news about chimps, “missing links,” and evolution—but the story has nothing to do with human origins or anthropology. What could it be?
It’s the “Grand Canyon of Durham” in England: a miniature canyon carved into a barley field by “torrential rain” over a weekend.
It’s a sad case of violence in Iraq: evidence of human-on-human violence from more than 50,000 years ago (allegedly).
Small biological changes that take generations—like some birds’ beaks growing longer or shorter in certain ecological niches—can be explained and understood by creationists and evolutionists. But when it comes to explaining developmental “leaps,” evolutionists must make a leap of logic.
The incredible way a turtle develops a shell—is it an evolutionary accident or part of God’s design?
The New York Times–News to Note conversation continues.
Due to a difference in a single gene, one bird species is splitting into two. Does this fit with the evolution model or the Genesis model of created kinds?
Evolutionists take another stab at answering what Charles Darwin called an “abominable mystery”: the abrupt appearance and ubiquity of flowering plants in the fossil record and on earth.
What do Americans think of science? What do they think of scientists? What do scientists think of science? A Pew Research Center study suggests answers.
As far as fliers go, most humans probably prefer watching birds or butterflies to bats. But in addition to sonar, bats have other interesting design features.
Several species of chevrotains (mouse deer) hide from predators in the water. Does that prove evolution?
Even testing to see if pupils know what creationists say is too much, declare evolutionists in an outcry over a GCSE exam question.
If you ain’t no good speaker of English, maybe you should talk to one o’ them thar monkeys to straight’n ya out.
A new genetic study of 53 human populations shows that each falls into one of three genetic groups—yet that the three groups aren’t as different as was thought. The legacy of Shem, Ham, and Japheth (Noah’s three sons), perhaps?
In covering a visit by paleontologists to our Creation Museum, a New York Times’ article spreads some misunderstanding (including in an associated blog by the reporter).
Changes in the color of columbine flowers: another example of “evolution in action” that has little to do with Darwin.
A “mummified” dinosaur with soft tissues fossilized—evidence of watery disaster?
For all the years of proclaiming chimpanzees as our closest living evolutionary cousins, some evolutionists think we may actually be more closely related to orangutans.
Neanderthals, though so often treated as subhuman, left a growing amount of evidence to remind us of their humanity.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.