Carpenter ant colonies evade zombie apocalypse because only the climbing dead become weapons of mass dispersion.
Another prominently reported example of “evolution” illustrates just the opposite—and supports the creationist critique of Darwinian evolution
Another prominently reported example of “evolution” illustrates just the opposite—and supports the creationist critique of Darwinian evolution.
What existed before the big bang? And can secular scientists and the Roman Catholic Church team up to answer that question?
A panel at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science tackled the often rocky relationship between science and religion.
It seems Darwin is celebrated more widely with each passing year, with popular annual events including Evolution Sunday and Darwin Day.
More research supports our view that historic humanity and modern humanity were far more similar than we “modern” humans often think.
It’s not just young-earth creationists who lean on catastrophic geological processes in explaining earth history. Old-earthers are also seeing the work of catastrophes in shaping the planet.
The focus of the article is purportedly “the final nail in the coffin” for those that don’t believe that birds evolved from dinosaurs. Or is this evolutionary dogma that just won’t fly away?
A few weeks ago we reported that the continued search for habitable extrasolar planets has revealed how special Earth is. So if aliens aren’t on planets orbiting other stars, where else could they be?
Why and how did “serpents” lose their limbs? The research may move forward, but the answer stays (largely) the same.
Human brains are getting smaller, yet we’re apparently getting smarter. Does that mean dinosaurs with walnut-sized brains could have actually been geniuses?
Bill Nye, the “science guy” of children’s television fame, recently answered a few questions for the magazine Popular Mechanics.
New research suggests that “if Lucy were alive today, she could fit in high heels or march for miles without breaking her feet”—evidence, researchers claim, that Lucy was an experienced upright walker
Do the potential benefits of embryonic stem cell research justify the destruction of tiny, unborn human lives? Or is there a viable alternative?
More than one in ten high school biology teachers in the U.S. “advocate” creationist beliefs in the classroom. But that’s not the biggest news.
Last May we covered research that suggested chimpanzees “provide special attention to loved ones before they die and grieve afterward,” which unsurprisingly prompted comparisons to human behavior
Two weeks ago, we looked at the argument—and responses to it—that certain cosmological constants are perfectly “fine tuned” for life, thus proving the existence of an intelligent designer. Now comes another rebuttal.
A marsupial frog from South America may not realize how special it is, but a team from Stony Brook University does.
Is it a jackal or a wolf—or just another reminder of an original created “dog” kind?
Carnivorous plants may seem, at first, to be a puzzling challenge to creationists’ claim that there was no need for death in nature as God designed it.
When considered alongside humans and chimps, the orangutan is the genomic “odd man out.” Is that because it hasn’t evolved as quickly?
A major fault line between creationists and evolutionists concerns the appearance of novel genetic information in nature. What does the latest research say about what’s supposed to be the driving force of evolution?
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.