Carpenter ant colonies evade zombie apocalypse because only the climbing dead become weapons of mass dispersion.
“There is a book . . .” Ken Ham reminded Nye at their 2014 debate, and the Bible’s history is history we can trust.
Small biological changes that take generations—like some birds’ beaks growing longer or shorter in certain ecological niches—can be explained and understood by creationists and evolutionists. But when it comes to explaining developmental “leaps,” evolutionists must make a leap of logic.
The New York Times–News to Note conversation continues.
Evolutionists take another stab at answering what Charles Darwin called an “abominable mystery”: the abrupt appearance and ubiquity of flowering plants in the fossil record and on earth.
Due to a difference in a single gene, one bird species is splitting into two. Does this fit with the evolution model or the Genesis model of created kinds?
What do Americans think of science? What do they think of scientists? What do scientists think of science? A Pew Research Center study suggests answers.
The incredible way a turtle develops a shell—is it an evolutionary accident or part of God’s design?
Even testing to see if pupils know what creationists say is too much, declare evolutionists in an outcry over a GCSE exam question.
If you ain’t no good speaker of English, maybe you should talk to one o’ them thar monkeys to straight’n ya out.
As far as fliers go, most humans probably prefer watching birds or butterflies to bats. But in addition to sonar, bats have other interesting design features.
Several species of chevrotains (mouse deer) hide from predators in the water. Does that prove evolution?
A “mummified” dinosaur with soft tissues fossilized—evidence of watery disaster?
Changes in the color of columbine flowers: another example of “evolution in action” that has little to do with Darwin.
A new genetic study of 53 human populations shows that each falls into one of three genetic groups—yet that the three groups aren’t as different as was thought. The legacy of Shem, Ham, and Japheth (Noah’s three sons), perhaps?
In covering a visit by paleontologists to our Creation Museum, a New York Times’ article spreads some misunderstanding (including in an associated blog by the reporter).
Three stories this week provide salient reminders of the design apparent in creation—whether it be in structures we’re just beginning to understand, or in engineers taking cues from nature to construct their machines.
For all the years of proclaiming chimpanzees as our closest living evolutionary cousins, some evolutionists think we may actually be more closely related to orangutans.
Scientists have found [indirect evidence of liquid water, which can be spun through evolutionary interpretations as indirect evidence of] life on one of Saturn’s moons!
Neanderthals, though so often treated as subhuman, left a growing amount of evidence to remind us of their humanity.
After tens of thousands of years trapped in ice, an ancient species “wakes up.” Is it science news or the plot of a low-budget movie?
Chimpanzees, dolphins, crows: out o’ the way! There’s a new “genius animal” in the spotlight.
A planet with a “steeply tilted” orbit—will it help refine theories of planetary formation or reveal their flaws?
Last week we reported on a solid scientific study that dismissed dinosaur-to-bird evolution. Of course, some researchers have yet to catch on.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.