Carpenter ant colonies evade zombie apocalypse because only the climbing dead become weapons of mass dispersion.
The New York Times–News to Note conversation continues.
What do Americans think of science? What do they think of scientists? What do scientists think of science? A Pew Research Center study suggests answers.
As far as fliers go, most humans probably prefer watching birds or butterflies to bats. But in addition to sonar, bats have other interesting design features.
Even testing to see if pupils know what creationists say is too much, declare evolutionists in an outcry over a GCSE exam question.
Several species of chevrotains (mouse deer) hide from predators in the water. Does that prove evolution?
If you ain’t no good speaker of English, maybe you should talk to one o’ them thar monkeys to straight’n ya out.
In covering a visit by paleontologists to our Creation Museum, a New York Times’ article spreads some misunderstanding (including in an associated blog by the reporter).
Changes in the color of columbine flowers: another example of “evolution in action” that has little to do with Darwin.
A “mummified” dinosaur with soft tissues fossilized—evidence of watery disaster?
A new genetic study of 53 human populations shows that each falls into one of three genetic groups—yet that the three groups aren’t as different as was thought. The legacy of Shem, Ham, and Japheth (Noah’s three sons), perhaps?
Neanderthals, though so often treated as subhuman, left a growing amount of evidence to remind us of their humanity.
Three stories this week provide salient reminders of the design apparent in creation—whether it be in structures we’re just beginning to understand, or in engineers taking cues from nature to construct their machines.
For all the years of proclaiming chimpanzees as our closest living evolutionary cousins, some evolutionists think we may actually be more closely related to orangutans.
Scientists have found [indirect evidence of liquid water, which can be spun through evolutionary interpretations as indirect evidence of] life on one of Saturn’s moons!
A planet with a “steeply tilted” orbit—will it help refine theories of planetary formation or reveal their flaws?
Just a few weeks after the Creation Museum’s second anniversary, the BBC asks, “So who goes to America’s biggest and best attended creationist museum and why?”
Last week we reported on a solid scientific study that dismissed dinosaur-to-bird evolution. Of course, some researchers have yet to catch on.
Chimpanzees, dolphins, crows: out o’ the way! There’s a new “genius animal” in the spotlight.
After tens of thousands of years trapped in ice, an ancient species “wakes up.” Is it science news or the plot of a low-budget movie?
Apes have been laughing for 10 million years, showing that laughter originated in a common ancestor of apes and humans. Ha!
The allegation that birds evolved from dinosaurs is frequently treated as factual by evolutionists. But an unexpected discovery about bird anatomy refutes this.
Creationists don’t claim dinosaurs are alive today. But since we know at least two of each dinosaur kind survived Noah’s flood, we view the possibility as notably more likely than evolutionists do.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.