The Big Bang is a naturalistic story about the origin and development of the universe, beginning with a “singularity” when all mass, energy, and space was contained in a small point. It is riddled with problems and, most importantly, contradicts the biblical teaching of creation.
Does observational science support the big bang, the idea that 13 billion years ago all matter came from nothing and eventually formed everything we see today?
Many Christians cheerfully accept the big bang as God’s method of creation. Are the Bible and the big bang compatible? Is the big bang scientifically sound?
How did this universe come into existence? Did God use “natural” methods to create the universe, or did He create everything supernaturally?
Many believers try harmonizing the Bible’s account of supernatural creation with the big bang’s naturalistic story of the universe’s origins. Can both be true?
The “big bang” story aims to explain the universe’s origin without God and simultaneously fails to align with either the Bible & established scientific findings.
Many people believe that the big bang is compatible with the biblical account of Creation. However, in order to make the big bang fit into the Bible, the biblical explanation is rearranged.
The big bang model has proven to be quite pliable, morphing to adapt to each new problem. Are these changes true improvements or rescuing devices?
A reader questions our claim that the big bang is an attempt to explain the universe without God. Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., responds.
The light-travel–time argument cannot be used to reject the Bible in favour of the big bang, with its billions of years. This is because the big bang model also has a light-travel–time problem.
One of the major proponents of using the big bang to prove God’s existence is the Christian philosopher William Lane Craig.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.