When considering how life began, there are only two options. Either life was created by an intelligent source (God) or it began by natural processes.
No mechanism by which non-living matter can randomly spark itself into life has ever been demonstrated. Information must come from a source of information.
To creationists, the incredible workings of the genetic code are not a mystery to be explained but instead a marvel to be understood as one of God’s most incredible designs. How such a coding system (even in a simpler form) could have arisen through random interaction is yet another leap of faith by evolutionists.
By assuming organic compounds ejected by stars could have fortified the primordial solar system, asteroids and meteorites, and of course earth with the building blocks of life, evolutionary scientists see such findings as a source to seed the process of molecules-to-man evolution.
In a quiet pond somewhere on early earth, the many complex chemicals necessary for life came together to produce the first living cell—or did they?
Is it possible for scientists to defy the law of biogenesis and create life in a laboratory or test tube?
What mysterious quality makes a creature alive at one moment but is absent the instant the creature dies? The Bible answers the question, “What is life?”
A recent article claims that by mimicking “cosmic evolution” in the lab, researchers have created some of the building blocks of life. But what’s really going on here?
The evolutionary explanation of complex life forms doesn’t add up.
If all the ingredients necessary for life can occur naturally, does that mean over time they can evolve into a living creature?
It is evident from both Scripture and observational science that abiogenesis is a myth, Genesis is real history, and God is the true life.
The origin of life is a complicated biological problem for those who deny God’s existence. It is such an issue that many naturalists refuse even to discuss it.
Why do so many intelligent people find the idea of molecules-to-man evolution compelling, while others consider it outrageously improbable?
Evolutionists speculate that life gradually evolved from mere hydrogen in a series of stages.
Biophysicists, observing the fascinating properties of liquid droplets, propose that liquid droplet physics could explain how life began.
The microbe LUCA is supposed to have been the Last Universal Common Ancestor of all living things.
The recent report of a 1.5-billion-year-old fossil1 has brought attention once again to the alleged evolution of multicellular systems.
All questions on the origin of life hinge on our understanding of genetics because the first cell couldn’t just form and then die.
Evolutionists hope the first chiral molecule discovered in interstellar space will shed light on the mystery of how life evolved its biochemical handedness.
Analysis of newly discovered deep-sea species led evolutionists to say that Xenoturbella, resembling a discarded purple sock, can help us understand evolution.
If a computer simulation can trace a path for the evolution of multicellular organisms from single-celled ones, does that mean they actually evolved that way?
It’s what we do know and can explain about DNA and protein and the laws of chemistry which suggests that life itself is the result of special creation.
Reluctant and surprised, I finally concluded that what we read in God’s Word is the surest guide to understanding what we see in God’s world.
Does the “world’s oldest sponge” confirm evolutionary beginnings of multicellular animal life at least 600 million years ago?
Some are claiming that researchers have taken a step toward showing how life could arise from non-life.
Swedish meteorite said to have triggered mass destruction and opened the way for life’s post-Cambrian explosion.
“Flower of the sea” is said to contain an evolutionary link between plants and animals.
Self-assembling virtual crystals are said to show the path to life from lifelessness.
Trace elements tell a tale of critically low oxygen that nearly turned out the lights on the evolution of complex life.
Researchers believe water trapped in tiny fractures within sulphide deposits has had no contact with water exposed for 1.5 to 2.64 billion years.
Researchers calculate that life had to have begun so long ago earth did not yet exist.
From these discussions it should again become clear that all efforts to explain an origin of information depending on matter alone fail empirically.
CERN summit seeks a “common ground” conclusion about the origin of everything.
Strelley Pool stromatolites strike another blow for early life.
Stable molecules still don’t hold the secret spark of life.
Ancient sponges take center stage as “our great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandmother.”
“Potentially prebiotic conditions” permit production of right-handed carbs.
The good of the one outweighs the good of the few and the many—the single-cell bottleneck that unleashes multicellular evolutionary potential(?)
Spectral signposts suggest interstellar seeds of life.
Believe it or not, the famous Miller–Urey experiment of the 1950s is still making headlines in the creation–evolution controversy.
The cellular slime mold might seem to be a lowly form of life—maybe just the sort that could conceivably have evolved from inanimate matter.
Whether it’s mica sheets or meteorites (or both), evolutionists have come up with theory after theory—most untestable, all unproven—about how life on earth got started. Here’s the latest.
Evolutionists continue to speculate about where life began. The latest answer? Between sheets of the geological substance mica.
The “chirality problem” isn’t exactly one of the most prominent topics of debate when it comes to origins. But that doesn’t mean evolutionists have forgotten the problem it poses for an “accidental” origin of life.
The evolution of the genetic code remains one of the most speculative, mysterious vignettes in the grand tale of evolution. On that subject, have evolutionary researchers made headway, or do they just reinforce the creationist’s perspective?
When considering how life began, there are only two options. Either life was created by an intelligent source (God) or it began by natural processes.
Astrobiologists may be a step closer to identifying prebiotic compounds in space. Now all they have to do is find the compounds!
Have Canadian scientists uncovered the key that makes an evolutionary origin of life plausible?
LUCA: I am your father?
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.