Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
Some creatures appear to have features found in both mammals and reptiles. These “mammal-like reptiles” are alleged to be the transitional forms between reptiles and mammals. As with all alleged evolutionary transitions, evolutionists themselves are unclear about what exactly evolved into what. They realize that this group of animals does not show an obvious transition from reptile to mammal.
It is not known which cynodont [a group of mammal-like reptiles] family was ancestral to mammals, or whether all the mammals originated from the same group (family) of cynodonts. In the vast literature concerning mammalian origins, it is easier to find suggestions that one or the other therapsid or cynodont family cannot be ancestral to the Mammalia, rather than to find a positive answer. (Z. Kielan-Jaworowska, “Interrelationships of Mesozoic mammals,” Historical Biology 6:3, 1992, p. 195.)
Additionally, there are tremendous differences between mammals and reptiles, which cannot be accounted for by information-losing mutations or natural selection.
Fossil of Tiktaalik, a type of fish that evolutionists mistakenly supposed was a transitional form between reptiles and mammals.1
Futher, John Woodmorappe points out that “rather than a progression to ‘mammalness,’ we observe an assortment of unmistakable reptilian traits and unmistakable mammalian traits.” (John Woodmorappe, “Walking whales, nested hierarchies, and chimeras: do they exist?,” TJ 16:1, 2002, pp. 111–119, available online at www.answersingenesis.org/missing-links/walking-whales-nested-hierarchies-and-chimeras-do-they-exist/.) He adds elsewhere:
…the traits usually considered unique to mammals are distributed variously throughout the mammal-like reptiles. While this distribution is not haphazard or random, it does not form lineages. … Just because some “mammalian” traits are present in mammal-like reptiles, this does not entail evolution in the slightest. It simply means that some traits now considered mammalian (by virtue of the fact that they are found only in extinct mammals) once existed in some extinct non-mammals. (J. Woodmorappe, “Mammal-like reptiles: major trait reversals and discontinuities,” TJ 15:1, 2001, pp. 44–52, available online at www.answersingenesis.org/fossils/transitional-fossils/mammal-like-reptiles-major-trait-reversals-and-discontinuities/.)