Many secular and atheist groups mock Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum for not being scientific. However, some of the most influential scientists past and present have been and are creationists (see below).
Would you like to add your name to the list or be involved in our peer review process? If so, please review our scientist inclusion procedure and tell us about yourself (for those who have received a PhD or master’s degree).
Are there scientists who have converted from the old-earth view? Dr. Tommy Mitchell shows us one who has.
This article is based on a recent conversation between Ken Ham (president and CEO of Answers in Genesis) and Dr. Andrew Snelling.
A new exhibit in Jerusalem gives a glimpse of documents that highlight the “religious intensity of a man many consider history’s greatest scientist.”
After a life of learning, geologist Roger Sigler has concluded that when it comes to “origins,” the Scriptures should be searched first and foremost.
Dr. Georgia Purdom gives her testimony about the path that led her to become a part of AiG.
Although evolutionists interpret the evidence in light of their belief in evolution, science works perfectly well without any connection to evolution.
How would you like to fly in an airplane produced by chance random processes—no intelligence involved?
Ken Ham interviews Ralph DiCosimo, a New York police officer with first-hand experience of the aftermath of the horrific happenings of 11 September 2001.
AiG receives numerous requests from students wanting to know how they can train to be “creation scientists.” We usually offer the following guidelines to these enquiring minds:
This is an amazing family: four siblings who all entered university by the age of 14 or younger (one at the age of 10!).
Nicolaus Steno has been recognized as making some of the first 'truly great discoveries' in geology. His fundamental principles of geology are still routinely used to interpret sedimentary rock layer
My scientific belief in creation is largely based on two thermodynamic laws of nature.
I believe that if we do our homework carefully enough, and without succumbing to bias, we will find that the Book, including a literal 6-day creation, will stand.
Biodiversity does not specify a six-day creation, it is not that finely focused, but it strongly supports such a possibility.
When I consider the great questions of origins from a broad perspective, the biblical model makes the most sense to me; it leaves fewer unanswered questions.
The creationist approach allows us to have an exceedingly intricate and beautiful world at the outset, ready for us to explore its wonders scientifically.
Many of the great scientists of the past were committed Christians and many of those were consciously exploring the implications of their Christian faith for science.
If we have found the Bible to be truthful in what we can independently check, we have a reason to trust it when it talks repeatedly about origins.
I have found that the Bible is accurate when it describes time, and historical or scientific facts. This is why I believe in a literal six-day creation.
The reliability of the six literal 24-hour days creation model is important to me because no person whose mind works similar to mine would accept any of the Bible if the very first part were wrong.
Even to be able to begin to have confidence in my ability to reason, I have to start with a revelation from the One who made me.
Examines naturalism based on three Scriptural tests to determine its validity.
Dr John Whitcomb was co-author, with Dr Henry Morris, of the famous 1961 book The Genesis Flood, widely regarded as launching the creationist revolution of the late twentieth century.
Sergei spoke of the vast cultural and philosophical differences between people in the former USSR and the West.
Fifteen theses are advanced, with supporting evidence, to show that the Galileo affair cannot serve as an argument for any position on the relation of religion and science.
A century ago, Lord Kelvin calculated an upper limit for the age of the Earth.
When I was interviewing Gary, I was fascinated by the thought of a Christian arresting people, and the like—so he asked me to spend a day with him.
Niles Eldredge wrote that no author who published in the Creation Research Society Quarterly “has contributed a single article to any reputable scientific journal.”
Many prominent scientists of the 16th and 17th centuries were intellectually committed to the Scriptures and to Christ.
One of the most serious fallacies of modern thought is the widespread notion that Biblical Christianity is in conflict with true science.
There is a widespread, but erroneous, view today that real scientists do not accept the truth of the Bible.
This article describes some of the founding scientists of the past and shows that they based their beliefs on biblical creation.
This tiny, yet beautiful, insect can perform a migration flight of thousands of kilometres, navigating unerringly to reach a place it has never seen.
Do creation scientists publish in secular journals?
An interview with eye-disease researcher Dr George Marshall, University of Glasgow, Scotland
I often contribute chapters on genetics. I know of no biological data relevant to tree genetics that would require evolutionary explanations.
Q:Dr Norman, what is the specific biomedical research area in which you have been labelled a groundbreaking pioneer?
Basil countered various heresies in his writings, including the allegorizing Genesis and all manner of strange interpretations of the rest of Scripture.
Dr. Warwick Glover is a general surgeon working in Melbourne, Australia. He is a Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.
Joseph Lister, the father of modern surgery, was also a commited Christian.
The Wright brothers used intelligence, experience, and ingenuity to design their aircraft. From studying God’s creation in the form of bird-flight, they were helped to develop their own creation.
David C C. Watson’s best-selling book has helped thousands see why a literal acceptance of Genesis makes the most sense. But what influenced David Watson to accept Genesis as literal?
When Luther looked at the text of Genesis concerning creation, he marvelled at Moses’ use of simple words and was troubled by the way many commentators and writers had confused the clear scripture.
In 1969, John, you were awarded the M.B.E. by the Queen for the major part you played in the development of a biological solution to the cactus problem.
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.