Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
Many people who have written on Genesis 1 have attempted to make a very significant distinction between two Hebrew words found there.PDF Download
This chapter will summarize the historical development of geology and in particular the development of the modern uniformitarian view of the geological record and the millions-of-years time-scale.PDF Download
What did Jesus think about the age of the earth? Did He say anything during His earthly life that would reveal His thinking?PDF Download
Feedback: Were fossils created ex nihilo during Creation Week?
In this article I provide a sampling of the arguments used by Drs. Ankerberg, Ross, and Kaiser along with my commentary.
Besides taking back the scientific disciplines of astronomy, biology, geology, archaeology, etc. which have been captured by the godless evolutionary worldview, we also need to take back theology.
For eleven days Dr. Mortenson had the privilege of presenting the truths of creation in Russia, a huge country of 11 time zones and 140 million people.
The order of events of creation recorded in Genesis 1 contradicts (at very many points) the order of events according to the evolution story.
“As an ID promoter, I read your critique of Dr. Dembski with great interest...”
“Why is Adam translated either man or mankind and not Adam?”
I have written a critique of statements made by Dr. William Dembski, who commented on President George Bush’s recent statement about ID and public schools.
The claims of evolutionists and some old-earth creationists that young-earth creationists don't have real degrees and don't do real scientific research that can be published are simply not true.
Australian scientists announced in February the discovery of dozens of fossilized sea turtles that they say have exciting implications for evolution.
Many Christians do not understand the stranglehold that philosophical naturalism has on geology and astronomy.
British scriptural geologists in the first half of the 19th century: part 12. George Young
The 33-page cover story of the November issue of National Geographic asks the question, “Was Darwin wrong?” The magazine surprised no one with their confident answer, “No!”
Respected Christian apologists Dr. John Ankerberg and Dr. Norman Geisler have launched another attack on young-earth creationism.
Why do so many in the church reject the plain teaching of Genesis? One significant reason is that so many seminary professors don’t really believe Genesis either.
When confronted with what the Bible says about origins, many Christians have argued that God could not have communicated that He created in this manner to people in a pre-scientific age.
British scriptural geologists in nineteenth century 11: John Murray
Nothing is known of Fowler De Johnsone apart from the words of his book addressed to William Buckland in 1838.
AiG has a multi-pronged strategy for calling the church back to the truth of Genesis. One aspect of this speaking in venues of Christian higher education, including the Evangelical Theological Society
No results found in .