Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
The uniformitarians believe that the couplets in the Green River Formation are varves, but evidence militates against this interpretationPDF Download
Show that ice core dating methods are not independent and open to significant reinterpretation. The root of the problem is the uncritical acceptance of the uniformitarian paradigm.
Michael Oard’s first contribution in this forum lays out a valid criticism of uniformitarian plate tectonics—namely the quantity and character of the sediments in the deep ocean trenches.
Baumgardner’s model is elegant, but contains many problems. The most serious seems to be assuming plate tectonics has been proven and too much uniformitarianism.
More information is provided from the ocean floor on the uniformitarian assumptions that undergird his belief in plate tectonics.
Taken together, the features of the Columbia River basalts suggest that they were mostly extruded and emplaced during the Late Abative Phase of the Recessive Stage of the Flood.
Uniformitarian scientists derive many more ‘annual layers’ in the Greenland ice cores than creationists because of their assumed old age time scale.
Catastrophic plate tectonics seems to be sped-up plate tectonics, a paradigm assumed too quickly and with many uniformitarian assumptions.
It is the Greenland Ice Sheet that exhibits annual cycles of one or more of the variables down an ice core.
Mammoth remains have puzzled scientists and laymen for hundreds of years.
Non-creationists do not believe there is objective evidence for a young earth. However, landforms now provide that evidence.
Anti-creationist, Arthur Strahler, takes biblical creationists to task for not having enough time to dissolve limestone caves and deposit speleothems.
Dinosaur extinction is still a major enigma of earth history. In this review article, extinctions in the geological record will be briefly mentioned.
No results found in .