Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
This paper aims to present a detailed overview of interpretations offered by conservative biblical scholars on the identity of “the sons of God” in Genesis 6.PDF Download
The human authors of Scripture always wrote precisely what God intended.
Who cares about the details of the Flood? This flippant attitude opened the door for attacks on the historicity of Genesis.
Genesis records the details of the Flood in a sequence we would not expect. That’s for a reason.
Jesus called Abel a prophet, though all we know about him is that his brother killed him. How could he be a prophet?
This paper contends that there is no real biblical evidence to suggest that the second law was inoperable prior to the curse.PDF Download
Is the Genesis Flood just another ancient myth?
This paper overviews the recent work of Peter Enns, The Evolution of Adam.PDF Download
No results found in .