Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
Of all of the claims of biological evolution perhaps none is more repugnant to conservative Christians than the bestial origin of man.
The graceful swan, the majestic eagle, the silent owl, and the cheeky sparrow—are these beautiful feathered creatures the result of evolution from dinosaurs?
What does the Bible tell us about the origin of birds, and just how good is the scientific evidence that some dinosaurs evolved into birds?
Why do so many intelligent people find the idea of molecules-to-man evolution compelling, while others consider it outrageously improbable?
Let’s take a look at the whole matter of aging and death from the perspective of both the Bible and science.
The essential “Darwinian” axiom of chance evolution by random change and “survival of the fittest” was broadly suggested by ancient Greek philosophers.
Evolutionism is a belief system based upon the assumption that there is a materialistic explanation for the origin of everything.
In an effort to fill the gap between apes and men, certain fossil men have been declared to be “apelike” and, thus, ancestral to at least “modern” man.
The bitterest pill to swallow for any Christian who attempts to “make peace” with Darwin is the presumed animal ancestry of man.
Interpretation of the Hebrew word yom in Genesis 1–2 has become one of the most contested issues among professing Christians and Jews.
The Scopes trial pitted William Jennings Bryan against Clarence Darrow in a confrontation over the teaching of evolution and creation in the public schools.
Evolutionists seek to explain the origin of species from a single, hypothetical, primordial life-form by means of progressive change and natural selection.
It has been said that no book, other than the Bible, has had a greater affect on society than Darwin’s On the Origin of Species.
Selected data and unprovable assumptions are a problem with all methods for determining the age of the earth, as well as for dating its fossils and rocks.
After visiting the Grand Canyon, I discovered that not only are the evolutionist’s “missing links” truly missing—their whole “ladder of life” is missing!
Since the time of Darwin, evolutionists have looked to the fossil record for historical evidence of evolution.
What does the fossil evidence say, and does it really support the evolutionary view of origins—or is it perhaps more consistent with Creation?
The light sensitive retina of the eye (which is really part of the brain) contains over 10 million photoreceptor cells.
The survival of living species depends on its ability to pass on its genetic instructions, from generation to generation, without significant alteration.
Darwin reasoned that if animals can be selectively bred by man to produce certain traits, then nature can select for limitless traits by natural selection.
The “human tail” is just one example of what evolutionists call a “vestigial organ.”
Almost from the beginning, evolutionists have attempted to equate the process of evolution with the progressive development of the embryo.
No results found in .