Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
Some recent creationists have attempted to address the light travel time problem indirectly with an implied appeal to a small universe.PDF Download
Just as all ideas have consequences, incorrect ideas can have very bad, or even dangerous, results.
This is an introduction to, and announcement of, a new compilation of articles, papers and letters to the editor on creationist astronomy which has been placed on this journal’s website.PDF Download
Danny R. Faulkner, AiG–U.S., examines the Dodwell hypothesis, that the earth underwent a catastrophic impact in 2345 BC that altered its axial tilt and then gradually recovered by about 1850.PDF Download
The rocks that Apollo astronauts brought back from the moon helped to demolish pet evolutionary ideas about the moon’s origin.
History shows that scientific “truth” changes over time. The uncertainty is the reason why continued testing of our ideas is so important in science.
One theory, proposed in the nineteenth century, was that the constellations represent the vestiges of a primal gospel that God gave to early man.
Physics is a relatively “clean” science because it deals mostly with the world as it exists. Yet it has struggled to explain some weird experimental results.
Some attribute the decline of NASA to the change in leadership in the early 1970s when NASA began to pursue evolutionary ideas.
It appears that the claim that we have found evidence of inflation is overstated. At best, the evidence is very indirect and to the point of being premature.
Some creationists believe that the scientific assault on the Bible did not begin with biological evolution, but with the acceptance of the geokinetic theory.
The problems with Bouw’s book pale in comparison with those of this book by Marshall Hall.
No results found in .