Looks like you are using an old version of Internet Explorer - Please update your browser
ET isn’t a mystery, if you’re willing to examine the data from 60 years of research and take it to its logical conclusion.
Where’s the supposed evidence that the earth is 4½ billion years old? It’s not on earth at all!
Sights like a lunar eclipse are possible only because of our moon’s unique relationship to the earth.
Secular scientists see evidence of global catastrophe on Venus and Mars. So why can’t they admit the evidence on earth?
Since early times, the human imagination has connected stars into familiar patterns, which we call constellations.
When a probe flew by Pluto, it made a shocking discovery: the surface is young. Astronomers are still scrambling to explain why.
The hypothesis that extragalactic redshifts are cosmological is strongly supported. I encourage fellow recent creationists to abandon their doubts that extragalactic redshifts are cosmological and better focus their work on explaining extragalactic redshifts in terms of a biblical cosmology.PDF Download
Many recent creationists appear to oppose the Hubble relation, the expansion of the universe, and/or cosmological redshifts of quasars. The rejection of these topics by many creationists appears to be motivated by fear of possible evolutionary implications.PDF Download
Virtually every aspect of modern life rests, in some way, on Isaac Newton’s findings. So it’s no surprise that everyone, even biblical creationists, wants to claim him as their hero. But we need to be careful. Whose side is he really on?
No results found in .