Answers Research Journal
2018 Volume 11
Cutting-edge creation research. Free. Answers Research Journal (ARJ) is a professional, peer-reviewed technical journal for the publication of interdisciplinary scientific and other relevant research from the perspective of the recent Creation and the global Flood within a biblical framework.
Contents
-
Feb. 28, 2018, pp. 1–21
For nearly a thousand years a small group of proponents have argued for a different translation of Genesis 1:1.
PDF Download -
March 7, 2018, pp. 23–29
It is here argued that the best interpretation is that Adam and Eve are real, historical persons.
PDF Download -
March 14, 2018, pp. 31–47
Many recent creationists appear to oppose the Hubble relation, the expansion of the universe, and/or cosmological redshifts of quasars. The rejection of these topics by many creationists appears to be motivated by fear of possible evolutionary implications.
PDF Download -
March 21, 2018, pp. 49–56
The hypothesis that extragalactic redshifts are cosmological is strongly supported. I encourage fellow recent creationists to abandon their doubts that extragalactic redshifts are cosmological and better focus their work on explaining extragalactic redshifts in terms of a biblical cosmology.
PDF Download -
April 25, 2018, pp. 57–62
Jeanson takes on a formidable task: To show that the theory of evolution is wrong, and to replace it with biblical creation. To make it short: Jeanson fails.
PDF Download -
April 25, 2018, pp. 63–83
Ironically, Frello has actually done me a great favor; his review ends up bolstering my original claims.
PDF Download -
June 13, 2018, pp. 85–140
Since the amount of U and Pb mobility in most cases has been small, then the determinations can be used to provide useful relative ages.
PDF Download -
June 20, 2018, pp. 141–148
We have been created fearfully and wonderfully by our Creator God, and the human body showcases God’s intricate design.
PDF Download -
June 27, 2018, pp. 149–170
This paper describes a numerical model for investigating the large-scale erosion, transport, and sedimentation processes associated with the Genesis Flood.
PDF Download -
July 11, 2018, pp. 171–191
The Genesis Flood produced drastic geological changes involving extremely energetic processes which also generated an enormous heat load.
PDF Download -
Aug. 22, 2018, pp. 193–204
Cephalopods, including octopuses, squids, cuttlefish, and nautiluses, are underrepresented in both genome sequencing projects as well as baraminology studies.
PDF Download -
Sept. 5, 2018, pp. 205–209
Results from this study negate the concept of the 98.5% DNA similarity myth and highlight the extremely flawed and humanized nature of the panTro4 version of the chimpanzee genome.
PDF Download -
Sept. 19, 2018, pp. 211–220
The palo verde tree is well known to residents of the desert southwest and Mexico, yet there are few studies of it in the technical literature.
PDF Download -
Sept. 26, 2018, pp. 221–226
Creationists frequently quote Hubble to the effect that he inserted the cosmological principle to avoid stark realties about the universe that his data implied.
PDF Download -
Oct. 17, 2018, pp. 227–236
The biblical account of Noah’s Flood provides an update to modern microbial biogeography and modern creation apologetics.
PDF Download -
Nov. 7, 2018, pp. 237–256
Fossil Grove offers multiple evidences in support of a huge forest biome floating atop the world’s pre-Flood oceans.
PDF Download -
Nov. 14, 2018, pp. 257–264
It is not unintelligible that God created everything good from the beginning; it is only unintelligible to the person who makes the claim.
PDF Download -
Nov. 21, 2018, pp. 265–274
I used to think that when creationists talk about creation and evolution as a clash between worldviews, they were wrong. Jeanson has helped me change my mind.
PDF Download -
Nov. 21, 2018, pp. 275–299
Frello’s recent critique is helpful progress in our discussion, and it argues for the strength of the science in Replacing Darwin.
PDF Download -
Dec. 5, 2018, pp. 301–340
Randy Guliuzza has made some controversial claims regarding the cause and nature of adaptation of organisms to their environment. We examine his claims.
PDF Download -
Dec. 19, 2018, pp. 341–358
It is highly improbable that Genesis 1:1 contains a genitive clause, and it is equally improbable that the verse could be rendered with a dependent clause.
PDF Download
Submit a Paper
High-quality papers for Answers Research Journal, sponsored by Answers in Genesis, are invited for submission.
- Read the Instructions to Authors Manual (PDF).
- Email papers, diagrams, tables, etc. to the email address listed in the Manual.
Support the creation/gospel message by donating or getting involved!
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ.
- Customer Service 800.778.3390
- © 2020 Answers in Genesis