Scientific facts work beautifully in a Christian worldview.
Critics have put forward creative but erroneous conjectures about the upcoming debate between Bill Nye and Ken Ham.
Dr. Andrew Snelling explains how radioactive dating methods may help us derive not absolute but relative ages of rocks.
Dr. Danny Faulkner identifies how different assumptions provide different explanations of the origin of comets.
Dr. Danny Faulkner answers questions about the light created on Day One and celestial objects on Day Four. Does belief in God violate operational science?
Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S., responds to a reader who believes that God may have miraculously calmed the waters around Noah’s Ark.
Troy Lacey shows that Christians can and do speak error, and that we must be willing to receive correction from Scripture.
Jeremy Ham responds to a skeptic’s charge that we contribute “to the ignorance of humanity.”
Roger Patterson responds to help people answer one of the many attempts of skeptics to discredit the authority of God’s Word over every aspect of life.
Dr. Andrew Snelling, AiG–U.S., responds to a common misconception that the Bible is silent on geological events.
Tim Lovett wraps up his response to a blogger regarding the seaworthiness of Noah’s Ark.
Tim Lovett continues his examination of wooden shipbuilding in response to a blogger.
Tim Lovett examines a blogger’s claims that Noah’s Ark would have been unable to float safely.
Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S., explains the reasoning behind the bow fin on our Ark design.
Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S., explains the purpose for Ark Encounter and the reason it is being built on land.
Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S., responds to a scoffer who thinks that Noah had no knowledge about boat building.
Troy Lacey, AiG–U.S., responds to a reader who is sad about what AiG teaches.
Wasn't the ark built by Noah and his family? Why does the Ark Encounter website show more people? Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S., explains.
Dr. Danny Faulkner, AiG–U.S., explains whether astronomers can see the surfaces of stars and what methods they use.
Nathan Ham responds to an email that accuses us of being stupid, lazy, unscientific, and morons for believing in a young earth and the existence of God.
Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell, AiG–U.S., explains why a placenta is not a living creature.
An unusually hostile letter to the editor recently appeared in a newspaper in AiG’s home state. It was memorable for its mistakes as well as its tone, and we decided to reply promptly.
In this week’s feedback article Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S. responds to someone who dared us to publish his comments about too many events allegedly happening on Day Six.
Tim Chaffey, AiG–U.S., responds to a reader who “weeps for humanity” due to the creation and gospel message of AiG.
No results found in Feedback.