In this issue . . .
A: According to Scripture, Noah’s Ark was a safe haven for representatives of all the kinds of air-breathing land animals and birds that God created. While it is possible that God made miraculous provisions for the daily care of these animals, it is not necessary—or required by Scripture—to appeal to miracles. Exploring natural solutions for day-to-day operations does not discount God’s role. It turns out that a study of existing, low-tech animal care methods answers trivial objections to the ark. In fact, many solutions to seemingly insurmountable problems are rather straightforward.
Anti-Bible critics have compared the challenges of caring for the animals with that of modern zoos. This is fallacious. We must distinguish between the long-term care required for animals kept in zoos and the temporary, emergency care required on the ark. The animals’ comfort and healthy appearance were not essential for emergency survival during one stressful year, where survival was the primary goal.
Read the whole article written by author John Woodmorappe from the New Answers Book 3 for further information on the size of the Ark, dinosaurs, ventilation, and foods for the animals, and more.
Be more effective in defending scriptural authority and the truth of Genesis as literal history. Join Ken Ham and leading creation scientists and authors as they provide concise answers to some of the most baffling questions about Christianity today.
Was the Medieval “Little Ice Age” Triggered by an Indonesian Volcano? Historical records corroborate frozen testimony that unravels the riddle of the Little Ice Age.
Pollen Places Floral Roots Deeper in the Fossil Record: Did Triassic dinosaurs wake up and smell the roses?
Cambrian Explosion Was the Culmination of Cascading Causes, Evolutionists Claim: Expanding underwater territory claimed as key to the Cambrian conundrum.
Did Darwin Promote Racism?
To download this image for use as wallpaper on your device, right-click on the link below for the desired resolution and select “Save Link/Target As...”
This week Steve Ham talks with AiG staff scientists Drs. Georgia Purdom and Andrew Snelling to answer the question, “How is the Intelligent Design Movement Flawed from the Start?”
This Week . . .
Pray for the meetings of our board of directors next week and all their reports, discussions, and decisions.
Thank God for these godly men who desire to see His gospel advanced in a increasingly secularized world.
Please do not reply to this email. If you need help or have a question, please visit our help area.
This message was sent to you at %%$email%% because you signed up online, at an event,
Answers in Genesis